[RAMEN9610-21564]vt: selection, push sel_lock up
authorJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:54:06 +0000 (12:54 +0100)
committerrobot <robot@samsung.com>
Thu, 14 May 2020 18:02:06 +0000 (03:02 +0900)
commit e8c75a30a23c6ba63f4ef6895cbf41fd42f21aa2 upstream.

sel_lock cannot nest in the console lock. Thanks to syzkaller, the
kernel states firmly:

> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 5.6.0-rc3-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz-executor.4/20336 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880a2e952a0 (&tty->termios_rwsem){++++}, at: tty_unthrottle+0x22/0x100 drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c:136
>
> but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff89462e70 (sel_lock){+.+.}, at: paste_selection+0x118/0x470 drivers/tty/vt/selection.c:374
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #2 (sel_lock){+.+.}:
>        mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1118
>        set_selection_kernel+0x3b8/0x18a0 drivers/tty/vt/selection.c:217
>        set_selection_user+0x63/0x80 drivers/tty/vt/selection.c:181
>        tioclinux+0x103/0x530 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:3050
>        vt_ioctl+0x3f1/0x3a30 drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c:364

This is ioctl(TIOCL_SETSEL).
Locks held on the path: console_lock -> sel_lock

> -> #1 (console_lock){+.+.}:
>        console_lock+0x46/0x70 kernel/printk/printk.c:2289
>        con_flush_chars+0x50/0x650 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:3223
>        n_tty_write+0xeae/0x1200 drivers/tty/n_tty.c:2350
>        do_tty_write drivers/tty/tty_io.c:962 [inline]
>        tty_write+0x5a1/0x950 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1046

This is write().
Locks held on the path: termios_rwsem -> console_lock

> -> #0 (&tty->termios_rwsem){++++}:
>        down_write+0x57/0x140 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1534
>        tty_unthrottle+0x22/0x100 drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c:136
>        mkiss_receive_buf+0x12aa/0x1340 drivers/net/hamradio/mkiss.c:902
>        tty_ldisc_receive_buf+0x12f/0x170 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:465
>        paste_selection+0x346/0x470 drivers/tty/vt/selection.c:389
>        tioclinux+0x121/0x530 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:3055
>        vt_ioctl+0x3f1/0x3a30 drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c:364

This is ioctl(TIOCL_PASTESEL).
Locks held on the path: sel_lock -> termios_rwsem

> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Chain exists of:
>   &tty->termios_rwsem --> console_lock --> sel_lock

Clearly. From the above, we have:
 console_lock -> sel_lock
 sel_lock -> termios_rwsem
 termios_rwsem -> console_lock

Fix this by reversing the console_lock -> sel_lock dependency in
ioctl(TIOCL_SETSEL). First, lock sel_lock, then console_lock.

Change-Id: I66582fe040ac9f82dbbfec9bc67dafe539ace3c3
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Reported-by: syzbot+26183d9746e62da329b8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 07e6124a1a46 ("vt: selection, close sel_buffer race")
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200228115406.5735-2-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
drivers/tty/vt/selection.c

index 8fe5f46ff7bbb6a0dd18e2e3c094567f817e2694..91ffe3f2b8a03a65ad5f9d52f3ef81e79f553f0e 100644 (file)
@@ -204,7 +204,6 @@ static int __set_selection(const struct tiocl_selection __user *sel, struct tty_
                pe = tmp;
        }
 
-       mutex_lock(&sel_lock);
        if (sel_cons != vc_cons[fg_console].d) {
                clear_selection();
                sel_cons = vc_cons[fg_console].d;
@@ -250,10 +249,9 @@ static int __set_selection(const struct tiocl_selection __user *sel, struct tty_
                        break;
                case TIOCL_SELPOINTER:
                        highlight_pointer(pe);
-                       goto unlock;
+                       return 0;
                default:
-                       ret = -EINVAL;
-                       goto unlock;
+                       return -EINVAL;
        }
 
        /* remove the pointer */
@@ -275,7 +273,7 @@ static int __set_selection(const struct tiocl_selection __user *sel, struct tty_
        else if (new_sel_start == sel_start)
        {
                if (new_sel_end == sel_end)     /* no action required */
-                       goto unlock;
+                       return 0;
                else if (new_sel_end > sel_end) /* extend to right */
                        highlight(sel_end + 2, new_sel_end);
                else                            /* contract from right */
@@ -302,8 +300,7 @@ static int __set_selection(const struct tiocl_selection __user *sel, struct tty_
        if (!bp) {
                printk(KERN_WARNING "selection: kmalloc() failed\n");
                clear_selection();
-               ret = -ENOMEM;
-               goto unlock;
+               return -ENOMEM;
        }
        kfree(sel_buffer);
        sel_buffer = bp;
@@ -328,8 +325,7 @@ static int __set_selection(const struct tiocl_selection __user *sel, struct tty_
                }
        }
        sel_buffer_lth = bp - sel_buffer;
-unlock:
-       mutex_unlock(&sel_lock);
+
        return ret;
 }
 
@@ -337,9 +333,11 @@ int set_selection(const struct tiocl_selection __user *v, struct tty_struct *tty
 {
        int ret;
 
+       mutex_lock(&sel_lock);
        console_lock();
        ret = __set_selection(v, tty);
        console_unlock();
+       mutex_unlock(&sel_lock);
 
        return ret;
 }