From ff2ef9021ea16188dbb355707fd31f6cf1a42ef7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hannes Eder Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:49:50 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] drivers/net/sfc: fix sparse warnings: Should it be static? Impact: Include the header file. If CONFIG_SFC_MTD is not defined then the functions 'efx_mtd_remove' and 'efx_mtd_rename' are defined 'static inline' with an empty function body in the header file, but the the whole file mtd.c is not built in this case. Fix this sparse warnings: drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:204:6: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_remove' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:221:6: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_rename' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:230:5: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_probe' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Hannes Eder Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c b/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c index 665cafb88d6a..820c233c3ea0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #define EFX_DRIVER_NAME "sfc_mtd" #include "net_driver.h" #include "spi.h" +#include "efx.h" #define EFX_SPI_VERIFY_BUF_LEN 16 -- 2.20.1