From febc88c5948f81114f64c3412011d695aecae233 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:46:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] semaphore: Add DEFINE_SEMAPHORE The full cleanup of init_MUTEX[_LOCKED] and DECLARE_MUTEX has not been done. Some of the users are real semaphores and we should name them as such instead of confusing everyone with "MUTEX". Provide the infrastructure to get finally rid of init_MUTEX[_LOCKED] and DECLARE_MUTEX. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Christoph Hellwig LKML-Reference: <20100907125054.795929962@linutronix.de> --- include/linux/semaphore.h | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/semaphore.h b/include/linux/semaphore.h index 7415839ac89..5310d27abd2 100644 --- a/include/linux/semaphore.h +++ b/include/linux/semaphore.h @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ struct semaphore { .wait_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).wait_list), \ } +#define DEFINE_SEMAPHORE(name) \ + struct semaphore name = __SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER(name, 1) + #define DECLARE_MUTEX(name) \ struct semaphore name = __SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER(name, 1) -- 2.20.1