From f7c17d26f43d5cc1b7a6b896cd2fa24a079739b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wanpeng Li Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 17:55:18 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: fix rebind bound workers warning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 16 at kernel/workqueue.c:4559 rebind_workers+0x1c0/0x1d0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 16 Comm: cpuhp/0 Not tainted 4.6.0-rc4+ #31 Hardware name: IBM IBM System x3550 M4 Server -[7914IUW]-/00Y8603, BIOS -[D7E128FUS-1.40]- 07/23/2013 0000000000000000 ffff881037babb58 ffffffff8139d885 0000000000000010 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff881037babba8 ffffffff8108505d ffff881037ba0000 000011cf3e7d6e60 0000000000000046 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x89/0xd4 __warn+0xfd/0x120 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 rebind_workers+0x1c0/0x1d0 workqueue_cpu_up_callback+0xf5/0x1d0 notifier_call_chain+0x64/0x90 ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf2/0x220 ? notify_prepare+0x80/0x80 __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10 __cpu_notify+0x35/0x50 notify_down_prepare+0x5e/0x80 ? notify_prepare+0x80/0x80 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x73/0x330 ? __schedule+0x33e/0x8a0 cpuhp_down_callbacks+0x51/0xc0 cpuhp_thread_fun+0xc1/0xf0 smpboot_thread_fn+0x159/0x2a0 ? smpboot_create_threads+0x80/0x80 kthread+0xef/0x110 ? wait_for_completion+0xf0/0x120 ? schedule_tail+0x35/0xf0 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x50 ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70 ---[ end trace eb12ae47d2382d8f ]--- notify_down_prepare: attempt to take down CPU 0 failed This bug can be reproduced by below config w/ nohz_full= all cpus: CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HOTPLUG_CPU0=y CONFIG_DEBUG_HOTPLUG_CPU0=y CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y As Thomas pointed out: | If a down prepare callback fails, then DOWN_FAILED is invoked for all | callbacks which have successfully executed DOWN_PREPARE. | | But, workqueue has actually two notifiers. One which handles | UP/DOWN_FAILED/ONLINE and one which handles DOWN_PREPARE. | | Now look at the priorities of those callbacks: | | CPU_PRI_WORKQUEUE_UP = 5 | CPU_PRI_WORKQUEUE_DOWN = -5 | | So the call order on DOWN_PREPARE is: | | CB 1 | CB ... | CB workqueue_up() -> Ignores DOWN_PREPARE | CB ... | CB X ---> Fails | | So we call up to CB X with DOWN_FAILED | | CB 1 | CB ... | CB workqueue_up() -> Handles DOWN_FAILED | CB ... | CB X-1 | | So the problem is that the workqueue stuff handles DOWN_FAILED in the up | callback, while it should do it in the down callback. Which is not a good idea | either because it wants to be called early on rollback... | | Brilliant stuff, isn't it? The hotplug rework will solve this problem because | the callbacks become symetric, but for the existing mess, we need some | workaround in the workqueue code. The boot CPU handles housekeeping duty(unbound timers, workqueues, timekeeping, ...) on behalf of full dynticks CPUs. It must remain online when nohz full is enabled. There is a priority set to every notifier_blocks: workqueue_cpu_up > tick_nohz_cpu_down > workqueue_cpu_down So tick_nohz_cpu_down callback failed when down prepare cpu 0, and notifier_blocks behind tick_nohz_cpu_down will not be called any more, which leads to workers are actually not unbound. Then hotplug state machine will fallback to undo and online cpu 0 again. Workers will be rebound unconditionally even if they are not unbound and trigger the warning in this progress. This patch fix it by catching !DISASSOCIATED to avoid rebind bound workers. Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Lai Jiangshan Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Suggested-by: Lai Jiangshan Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li --- kernel/workqueue.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 801a698564d4..1b2e36b2f31f 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -4555,6 +4555,17 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool) pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0); spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); + + /* + * XXX: CPU hotplug notifiers are weird and can call DOWN_FAILED + * w/o preceding DOWN_PREPARE. Work around it. CPU hotplug is + * being reworked and this can go away in time. + */ + if (!(pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED)) { + spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); + return; + } + pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED; for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) { -- 2.20.1