From ee4eec478be4677b93775d17bc079efb5922b276 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Chinner Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 09:23:24 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] xfs: list_lru_init returns a negative error And we don't invert it properly when initialising the dquot lru list. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Reviewed-by: Jie Liu Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner --- fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c index 348e4d2ed6e6..dc977b6e6a36 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c @@ -843,22 +843,17 @@ xfs_qm_init_quotainfo( qinf = mp->m_quotainfo = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(xfs_quotainfo_t), KM_SLEEP); - if ((error = list_lru_init(&qinf->qi_lru))) { - kmem_free(qinf); - mp->m_quotainfo = NULL; - return error; - } + error = -list_lru_init(&qinf->qi_lru); + if (error) + goto out_free_qinf; /* * See if quotainodes are setup, and if not, allocate them, * and change the superblock accordingly. */ - if ((error = xfs_qm_init_quotainos(mp))) { - list_lru_destroy(&qinf->qi_lru); - kmem_free(qinf); - mp->m_quotainfo = NULL; - return error; - } + error = xfs_qm_init_quotainos(mp); + if (error) + goto out_free_lru; INIT_RADIX_TREE(&qinf->qi_uquota_tree, GFP_NOFS); INIT_RADIX_TREE(&qinf->qi_gquota_tree, GFP_NOFS); @@ -918,7 +913,7 @@ xfs_qm_init_quotainfo( qinf->qi_isoftlimit = be64_to_cpu(ddqp->d_ino_softlimit); qinf->qi_rtbhardlimit = be64_to_cpu(ddqp->d_rtb_hardlimit); qinf->qi_rtbsoftlimit = be64_to_cpu(ddqp->d_rtb_softlimit); - + xfs_qm_dqdestroy(dqp); } else { qinf->qi_btimelimit = XFS_QM_BTIMELIMIT; @@ -935,6 +930,13 @@ xfs_qm_init_quotainfo( qinf->qi_shrinker.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE; register_shrinker(&qinf->qi_shrinker); return 0; + +out_free_lru: + list_lru_destroy(&qinf->qi_lru); +out_free_qinf: + kmem_free(qinf); + mp->m_quotainfo = NULL; + return error; } -- 2.20.1