From ec5a36f94e7ca4b1f28ae4dd135cd415a704e772 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:57:10 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] SLAB: Fix lockdep annotations

Commit 8429db5... ("slab: setup cpu caches later on when interrupts are
enabled") broke mm/slab.c lockdep annotations:

  [   11.554715] =============================================
  [   11.555249] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
  [   11.555560] 2.6.31-rc1 #896
  [   11.555861] ---------------------------------------------
  [   11.556127] udevd/1899 is trying to acquire lock:
  [   11.556436]  (&nc->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff810c337f>] kmem_cache_free+0xcd/0x25b
  [   11.557101]
  [   11.557102] but task is already holding lock:
  [   11.557706]  (&nc->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff810c3cd0>] kfree+0x137/0x292
  [   11.558109]
  [   11.558109] other info that might help us debug this:
  [   11.558720] 2 locks held by udevd/1899:
  [   11.558983]  #0:  (&nc->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff810c3cd0>] kfree+0x137/0x292
  [   11.559734]  #1:  (&parent->list_lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff810c36c7>] __drain_alien_cache+0x3b/0xbd
  [   11.560442]
  [   11.560443] stack backtrace:
  [   11.561009] Pid: 1899, comm: udevd Not tainted 2.6.31-rc1 #896
  [   11.561276] Call Trace:
  [   11.561632]  [<ffffffff81065ed6>] __lock_acquire+0x15ec/0x168f
  [   11.561901]  [<ffffffff81065f60>] ? __lock_acquire+0x1676/0x168f
  [   11.562171]  [<ffffffff81063c52>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x113/0x13e
  [   11.562490]  [<ffffffff8150c337>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
  [   11.562807]  [<ffffffff8106603a>] lock_acquire+0xc1/0xe5
  [   11.563073]  [<ffffffff810c337f>] ? kmem_cache_free+0xcd/0x25b
  [   11.563385]  [<ffffffff8150c8fc>] _spin_lock+0x31/0x66
  [   11.563696]  [<ffffffff810c337f>] ? kmem_cache_free+0xcd/0x25b
  [   11.563964]  [<ffffffff810c337f>] kmem_cache_free+0xcd/0x25b
  [   11.564235]  [<ffffffff8109bf8c>] ? __free_pages+0x1b/0x24
  [   11.564551]  [<ffffffff810c3564>] slab_destroy+0x57/0x5c
  [   11.564860]  [<ffffffff810c3641>] free_block+0xd8/0x123
  [   11.565126]  [<ffffffff810c372e>] __drain_alien_cache+0xa2/0xbd
  [   11.565441]  [<ffffffff810c3ce5>] kfree+0x14c/0x292
  [   11.565752]  [<ffffffff8144a007>] skb_release_data+0xc6/0xcb
  [   11.566020]  [<ffffffff81449cf0>] __kfree_skb+0x19/0x86
  [   11.566286]  [<ffffffff81449d88>] consume_skb+0x2b/0x2d
  [   11.566631]  [<ffffffff8144cbe0>] skb_free_datagram+0x14/0x3a
  [   11.566901]  [<ffffffff81462eef>] netlink_recvmsg+0x164/0x258
  [   11.567170]  [<ffffffff81443461>] sock_recvmsg+0xe5/0xfe
  [   11.567486]  [<ffffffff810ab063>] ? might_fault+0xaf/0xb1
  [   11.567802]  [<ffffffff81053a78>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
  [   11.568073]  [<ffffffff810d84ca>] ? core_sys_select+0x3d/0x2b4
  [   11.568378]  [<ffffffff81065f60>] ? __lock_acquire+0x1676/0x168f
  [   11.568693]  [<ffffffff81442dc1>] ? sockfd_lookup_light+0x1b/0x54
  [   11.568961]  [<ffffffff81444416>] sys_recvfrom+0xa3/0xf8
  [   11.569228]  [<ffffffff81063c8a>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
  [   11.569546]  [<ffffffff8100af2b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b#

Fix that up.

Closes-bug: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13654
Tested-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
---
 mm/slab.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index 5241b6598ba3..7b5d4deacfcd 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -1544,9 +1544,6 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
 	}
 
 	g_cpucache_up = EARLY;
-
-	/* Annotate slab for lockdep -- annotate the malloc caches */
-	init_lock_keys();
 }
 
 void __init kmem_cache_init_late(void)
@@ -1563,6 +1560,9 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init_late(void)
 	/* Done! */
 	g_cpucache_up = FULL;
 
+	/* Annotate slab for lockdep -- annotate the malloc caches */
+	init_lock_keys();
+
 	/*
 	 * Register a cpu startup notifier callback that initializes
 	 * cpu_cache_get for all new cpus
-- 
2.20.1