From ea3793ee29d3621faf857fa8ef5425e9ff9a756d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rainer Weikusat Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 21:11:34 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] core: enable more fine-grained datagram reception control The __skb_recv_datagram routine in core/ datagram.c provides a general skb reception factility supposed to be utilized by protocol modules providing datagram sockets. It encompasses both the actual recvmsg code and a surrounding 'sleep until data is available' loop. This is inconvenient if a protocol module has to use additional locking in order to maintain some per-socket state the generic datagram socket code is unaware of (as the af_unix code does). The patch below moves the recvmsg proper code into a new __skb_try_recv_datagram routine which doesn't sleep and renames wait_for_more_packets to __skb_wait_for_more_packets, both routines being exported interfaces. The original __skb_recv_datagram routine is reimplemented on top of these two functions such that its user-visible behaviour remains unchanged. Signed-off-by: Rainer Weikusat Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- include/linux/skbuff.h | 6 ++++ net/core/datagram.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h index c9c394bf0771..9b9b9ead7bb3 100644 --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h @@ -2785,6 +2785,12 @@ static inline void skb_frag_list_init(struct sk_buff *skb) #define skb_walk_frags(skb, iter) \ for (iter = skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list; iter; iter = iter->next) + +int __skb_wait_for_more_packets(struct sock *sk, int *err, long *timeo_p, + const struct sk_buff *skb); +struct sk_buff *__skb_try_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned flags, + int *peeked, int *off, int *err, + struct sk_buff **last); struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned flags, int *peeked, int *off, int *err); struct sk_buff *skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned flags, int noblock, diff --git a/net/core/datagram.c b/net/core/datagram.c index d62af69ad844..7daff66d3d0b 100644 --- a/net/core/datagram.c +++ b/net/core/datagram.c @@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ static int receiver_wake_function(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned int mode, int syn /* * Wait for the last received packet to be different from skb */ -static int wait_for_more_packets(struct sock *sk, int *err, long *timeo_p, - const struct sk_buff *skb) +int __skb_wait_for_more_packets(struct sock *sk, int *err, long *timeo_p, + const struct sk_buff *skb) { int error; DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, receiver_wake_function); @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ out_noerr: error = 1; goto out; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__skb_wait_for_more_packets); static struct sk_buff *skb_set_peeked(struct sk_buff *skb) { @@ -161,13 +162,15 @@ done: } /** - * __skb_recv_datagram - Receive a datagram skbuff + * __skb_try_recv_datagram - Receive a datagram skbuff * @sk: socket * @flags: MSG_ flags * @peeked: returns non-zero if this packet has been seen before * @off: an offset in bytes to peek skb from. Returns an offset * within an skb where data actually starts * @err: error code returned + * @last: set to last peeked message to inform the wait function + * what to look for when peeking * * Get a datagram skbuff, understands the peeking, nonblocking wakeups * and possible races. This replaces identical code in packet, raw and @@ -175,9 +178,11 @@ done: * the long standing peek and read race for datagram sockets. If you * alter this routine remember it must be re-entrant. * - * This function will lock the socket if a skb is returned, so the caller - * needs to unlock the socket in that case (usually by calling - * skb_free_datagram) + * This function will lock the socket if a skb is returned, so + * the caller needs to unlock the socket in that case (usually by + * calling skb_free_datagram). Returns NULL with *err set to + * -EAGAIN if no data was available or to some other value if an + * error was detected. * * * It does not lock socket since today. This function is * * free of race conditions. This measure should/can improve @@ -191,13 +196,13 @@ done: * quite explicitly by POSIX 1003.1g, don't change them without having * the standard around please. */ -struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags, - int *peeked, int *off, int *err) +struct sk_buff *__skb_try_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags, + int *peeked, int *off, int *err, + struct sk_buff **last) { struct sk_buff_head *queue = &sk->sk_receive_queue; - struct sk_buff *skb, *last; + struct sk_buff *skb; unsigned long cpu_flags; - long timeo; /* * Caller is allowed not to check sk->sk_err before skb_recv_datagram() */ @@ -206,8 +211,6 @@ struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags, if (error) goto no_packet; - timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT); - do { /* Again only user level code calls this function, so nothing * interrupt level will suddenly eat the receive_queue. @@ -217,10 +220,10 @@ struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags, */ int _off = *off; - last = (struct sk_buff *)queue; + *last = (struct sk_buff *)queue; spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->lock, cpu_flags); skb_queue_walk(queue, skb) { - last = skb; + *last = skb; *peeked = skb->peeked; if (flags & MSG_PEEK) { if (_off >= skb->len && (skb->len || _off || @@ -231,8 +234,11 @@ struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags, skb = skb_set_peeked(skb); error = PTR_ERR(skb); - if (IS_ERR(skb)) - goto unlock_err; + if (IS_ERR(skb)) { + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->lock, + cpu_flags); + goto no_packet; + } atomic_inc(&skb->users); } else @@ -242,25 +248,38 @@ struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags, *off = _off; return skb; } + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->lock, cpu_flags); + } while (sk_can_busy_loop(sk) && + sk_busy_loop(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT)); - if (sk_can_busy_loop(sk) && - sk_busy_loop(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT)) - continue; + error = -EAGAIN; - /* User doesn't want to wait */ - error = -EAGAIN; - if (!timeo) - goto no_packet; +no_packet: + *err = error; + return NULL; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__skb_try_recv_datagram); - } while (!wait_for_more_packets(sk, err, &timeo, last)); +struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags, + int *peeked, int *off, int *err) +{ + struct sk_buff *skb, *last; + long timeo; - return NULL; + timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT); + + do { + skb = __skb_try_recv_datagram(sk, flags, peeked, off, err, + &last); + if (skb) + return skb; + + if (*err != EAGAIN) + break; + } while (timeo && + !__skb_wait_for_more_packets(sk, err, &timeo, last)); -unlock_err: - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->lock, cpu_flags); -no_packet: - *err = error; return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__skb_recv_datagram); -- 2.20.1