From e9d5a48499391fe5b0615610858665ba8149e255 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Abbott Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:50:58 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] linux/bug.h: correct formatting of block comment Correct these checkpatch.pl warnings: |WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines |#34: FILE: include/linux/bug.h:34: |+/* Force a compilation error if condition is true, but also produce a |+ result (of value 0 and type size_t), so the expression can be used |WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line |#36: FILE: include/linux/bug.h:36: |+ aren't permitted). */ Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170525120316.24473-3-abbotti@mev.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Rasmus Villemoes Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- include/linux/bug.h | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/bug.h b/include/linux/bug.h index 687b557fc5eb..ca24007e2dc3 100644 --- a/include/linux/bug.h +++ b/include/linux/bug.h @@ -30,10 +30,12 @@ struct pt_regs; #define BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n) \ BUILD_BUG_ON((n) == 0 || (((n) & ((n) - 1)) != 0)) -/* Force a compilation error if condition is true, but also produce a - result (of value 0 and type size_t), so the expression can be used - e.g. in a structure initializer (or where-ever else comma expressions - aren't permitted). */ +/* + * Force a compilation error if condition is true, but also produce a + * result (of value 0 and type size_t), so the expression can be used + * e.g. in a structure initializer (or where-ever else comma expressions + * aren't permitted). + */ #define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (sizeof(struct { int:-!!(e); })) #define BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(e) ((void *)sizeof(struct { int:-!!(e); })) -- 2.20.1