From e40cc4bdfd4b89813f072f72bd9c7055814d3f0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Beulich Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:23:05 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] x86/hwmon: register alternate sibling upon CPU removal Just like pkgtemp registers another core of the same package when one gets removed, coretemp should register another hyperthread (if available) in that situation. As pointed out in the patch fixing the respective code in pkgtemp, the list protectng mutex must be dropped before calling coretemp_device_add(), and due to the restructured loop (including an explicit return) the "safe" variant of the list iterator isn't needed anymore. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Cc: Rudolf Marek Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck --- drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 22 +++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c index 5850da64ae28..baa842a80b4b 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c @@ -491,14 +491,22 @@ exit: static void coretemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu) { - struct pdev_entry *p, *n; + struct pdev_entry *p; + unsigned int i; + mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex); - list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &pdev_list, list) { - if (p->cpu == cpu) { - platform_device_unregister(p->pdev); - list_del(&p->list); - kfree(p); - } + list_for_each_entry(p, &pdev_list, list) { + if (p->cpu != cpu) + continue; + + platform_device_unregister(p->pdev); + list_del(&p->list); + mutex_unlock(&pdev_list_mutex); + kfree(p); + for_each_cpu(i, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu)) + if (i != cpu && !coretemp_device_add(i)) + break; + return; } mutex_unlock(&pdev_list_mutex); } -- 2.20.1