From e3265ea364c7ed5accc9955f8b805c380149870f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Chiang Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:24:07 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] PCI Hotplug: cpqphp: eliminate dead code - PCI_ScanBusNonBridge I have no clue what the original intent here was, but the code as written is useless. The old dbg() statement above the old callsite might lead one to think that at one point, there was supposed to be some recursion, but any sense of sanity here has been lost to the ravages of time. Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes --- drivers/pci/hotplug/cpqphp_pci.c | 14 ++------------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/cpqphp_pci.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/cpqphp_pci.c index 6201281b9dab..3e3acc7e7461 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/cpqphp_pci.c +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/cpqphp_pci.c @@ -193,16 +193,6 @@ int cpqhp_set_irq (u8 bus_num, u8 dev_num, u8 int_pin, u8 irq_num) } -/* - * WTF??? This function isn't in the code, yet a function calls it, but the - * compiler optimizes it away? strange. Here as a placeholder to keep the - * compiler happy. - */ -static int PCI_ScanBusNonBridge (u8 bus, u8 device) -{ - return 0; -} - static int PCI_ScanBusForNonBridge(struct controller *ctrl, u8 bus_num, u8 * dev_num) { u16 tdevice; @@ -231,9 +221,9 @@ static int PCI_ScanBusForNonBridge(struct controller *ctrl, u8 bus_num, u8 * dev /* Yep we got one. bridge ? */ if ((work >> 8) == PCI_TO_PCI_BRIDGE_CLASS) { pci_bus_read_config_byte (ctrl->pci_bus, PCI_DEVFN(tdevice, 0), PCI_SECONDARY_BUS, &tbus); + /* XXX: no recursion, wtf? */ dbg("Recurse on bus_num %d tdevice %d\n", tbus, tdevice); - if (PCI_ScanBusNonBridge(tbus, tdevice) == 0) - return 0; + return 0; } } -- 2.20.1