From df2c8ec28e73d47392b8cb24828c15c54819da41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:30:47 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: dt: No need to fetch voltage-tolerance Its already done by core and we don't need to get it anymore. And so, we don't need to get of node in cpufreq_init() anymore, move that to find_supply_name() instead. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c index 150a172c7d0a..bbafd7b63d1a 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ struct private_data { struct device *cpu_dev; struct regulator *cpu_reg; struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev; - unsigned int voltage_tolerance; /* in percentage */ const char *reg_name; }; @@ -55,24 +54,38 @@ static int set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) * An earlier version of opp-v1 bindings used to name the regulator * "cpu0-supply", we still need to handle that for backwards compatibility. */ -static const char *find_supply_name(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np) +static const char *find_supply_name(struct device *dev) { + struct device_node *np; struct property *pp; int cpu = dev->id; + const char *name = NULL; + + np = of_node_get(dev->of_node); + + /* This must be valid for sure */ + if (WARN_ON(!np)) + return NULL; /* Try "cpu0" for older DTs */ if (!cpu) { pp = of_find_property(np, "cpu0-supply", NULL); - if (pp) - return "cpu0"; + if (pp) { + name = "cpu0"; + goto node_put; + } } pp = of_find_property(np, "cpu-supply", NULL); - if (pp) - return "cpu"; + if (pp) { + name = "cpu"; + goto node_put; + } dev_dbg(dev, "no regulator for cpu%d\n", cpu); - return NULL; +node_put: + of_node_put(np); + return name; } static int allocate_resources(int cpu, struct device **cdev, @@ -147,7 +160,6 @@ try_again: static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table; - struct device_node *np; struct private_data *priv; struct device *cpu_dev; struct regulator *cpu_reg; @@ -164,13 +176,6 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) return ret; } - np = of_node_get(cpu_dev->of_node); - if (!np) { - dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to find cpu%d node\n", policy->cpu); - ret = -ENOENT; - goto out_put_reg_clk; - } - /* Get OPP-sharing information from "operating-points-v2" bindings */ ret = dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus(cpu_dev, policy->cpus); if (ret) { @@ -181,20 +186,20 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) if (ret == -ENOENT) opp_v1 = true; else - goto out_node_put; + goto out_put_reg_clk; } /* * OPP layer will be taking care of regulators now, but it needs to know * the name of the regulator first. */ - name = find_supply_name(cpu_dev, np); + name = find_supply_name(cpu_dev); if (name) { ret = dev_pm_opp_set_regulator(cpu_dev, name); if (ret) { dev_err(cpu_dev, "Failed to set regulator for cpu%d: %d\n", policy->cpu, ret); - goto out_node_put; + goto out_put_reg_clk; } } @@ -244,7 +249,6 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) } priv->reg_name = name; - of_property_read_u32(np, "voltage-tolerance", &priv->voltage_tolerance); ret = dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table); if (ret) { @@ -286,8 +290,6 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = transition_latency; - of_node_put(np); - return 0; out_free_cpufreq_table: @@ -298,8 +300,6 @@ out_free_opp: dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(policy->cpus); if (name) dev_pm_opp_put_regulator(cpu_dev); -out_node_put: - of_node_put(np); out_put_reg_clk: clk_put(cpu_clk); if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg)) -- 2.20.1