From db73ee0d463799223244e96e7b7eea73b4a6ec31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michal Hocko Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 16:21:11 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: do not loop on too_many_isolated for ever Tetsuo Handa has reported[1][2][3] that direct reclaimers might get stuck in too_many_isolated loop basically for ever because the last few pages on the LRU lists are isolated by the kswapd which is stuck on fs locks when doing the pageout or slab reclaim. This in turn means that there is nobody to actually trigger the oom killer and the system is basically unusable. too_many_isolated has been introduced by commit 35cd78156c49 ("vmscan: throttle direct reclaim when too many pages are isolated already") to prevent from pre-mature oom killer invocations because back then no reclaim progress could indeed trigger the OOM killer too early. But since the oom detection rework in commit 0a0337e0d1d1 ("mm, oom: rework oom detection") the allocation/reclaim retry loop considers all the reclaimable pages and throttles the allocation at that layer so we can loosen the direct reclaim throttling. Make shrink_inactive_list loop over too_many_isolated bounded and returns immediately when the situation hasn't resolved after the first sleep. Replace congestion_wait by a simple schedule_timeout_interruptible because we are not really waiting on the IO congestion in this path. Please note that this patch can theoretically cause the OOM killer to trigger earlier while there are many pages isolated for the reclaim which makes progress only very slowly. This would be obvious from the oom report as the number of isolated pages are printed there. If we ever hit this should_reclaim_retry should consider those numbers in the evaluation in one way or another. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201602092349.ACG81273.OSVtMJQHLOFOFF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201702212335.DJB30777.JOFMHSFtVLQOOF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp [3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201706300914.CEH95859.FMQOLVFHJFtOOS@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp [mhocko@suse.com: switch to uninterruptible sleep] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170724065048.GB25221@dhcp22.suse.cz Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170710074842.23175-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa Tested-by: Tetsuo Handa Acked-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Rik van Riel Acked-by: Johannes Weiner Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/vmscan.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 095817820a56..1638814c7848 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1743,9 +1743,15 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec, int file = is_file_lru(lru); struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec); struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = &lruvec->reclaim_stat; + bool stalled = false; while (unlikely(too_many_isolated(pgdat, file, sc))) { - congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10); + if (stalled) + return 0; + + /* wait a bit for the reclaimer. */ + msleep(100); + stalled = true; /* We are about to die and free our memory. Return now. */ if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) -- 2.20.1