From d10ff3fb62bd38415c0f7be3d75d107e1f67e59a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:10:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] timekeeping fix patch got mis-applied The time keeping code move to kernel/time/timekeeping.c broke the clocksource resume logic patch, which got applied to the old file by a fuzzy application. Fix it up and move the clocksource_resume() call to the appropriate place. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner [ tssk, tssk, everybody should use --fuzz=0 ] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 2 ++ kernel/timer.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c index f9217bf644f6..3d1042f82a68 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -273,6 +273,8 @@ static int timekeeping_resume(struct sys_device *dev) unsigned long flags; unsigned long now = read_persistent_clock(); + clocksource_resume(); + write_seqlock_irqsave(&xtime_lock, flags); if (now && (now > timekeeping_suspend_time)) { diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c index a6c580ac084b..5ec5490f8d85 100644 --- a/kernel/timer.c +++ b/kernel/timer.c @@ -1499,8 +1499,6 @@ unregister_time_interpolator(struct time_interpolator *ti) prev = &curr->next; } - clocksource_resume(); - write_seqlock_irqsave(&xtime_lock, flags); if (ti == time_interpolator) { /* we lost the best time-interpolator: */ -- 2.20.1