From d0db7afa1b767d95e3e14632718da5a9794129bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:33:47 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] revert "mm: memcontrol: fix possible css ref leak on oom"

Revert commit 1383399d7be0 ("mm: memcontrol: fix possible css ref leak
on oom").  Johannes points out "There is a task_in_memcg_oom() check
before calling mem_cgroup_oom()".

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 58c69c94402a..75e74408cc8f 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@ static void memcg_oom_recover(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 
 static void mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t mask, int order)
 {
-	if (!current->memcg_may_oom || current->memcg_in_oom)
+	if (!current->memcg_may_oom)
 		return;
 	/*
 	 * We are in the middle of the charge context here, so we
-- 
2.20.1