From d074912d2edeae8eb08d3f85a3f0dab0b3606089 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bob Peterson Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:24:13 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] gfs2: Don't reject a supposedly full bitmap if we have blocks reserved [ Upstream commit e79e0e1428188b24c3b57309ffa54a33c4ae40c4 ] Before this patch, you could get into situations like this: 1. Process 1 searches for X free blocks, finds them, makes a reservation 2. Process 2 searches for free blocks in the same rgrp, but now the bitmap is full because process 1's reservation is skipped over. So it marks the bitmap as GBF_FULL. 3. Process 1 tries to allocate blocks from its own reservation, but since the GBF_FULL bit is set, it skips over the rgrp and searches elsewhere, thus not using its own reservation. This patch adds an additional check to allow processes to use their own reservations. Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/gfs2/rgrp.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c index 95b2a57ded33..5fe033131f03 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c @@ -1665,7 +1665,8 @@ static int gfs2_rbm_find(struct gfs2_rbm *rbm, u8 state, u32 *minext, while(1) { bi = rbm_bi(rbm); - if (test_bit(GBF_FULL, &bi->bi_flags) && + if ((ip == NULL || !gfs2_rs_active(&ip->i_res)) && + test_bit(GBF_FULL, &bi->bi_flags) && (state == GFS2_BLKST_FREE)) goto next_bitmap; -- 2.20.1