From c772be939e078afd2505ede7d596a30f8f61de95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:08:25 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] memcg: fix calculation of active_ratio Currently, inactive_ratio of memcg is calculated at setting limit. because page_alloc.c does so and current implementation is straightforward porting. However, memcg introduced hierarchy feature recently. In hierarchy restriction, memory limit is not only decided memory.limit_in_bytes of current cgroup, but also parent limit and sibling memory usage. Then, The optimal inactive_ratio is changed frequently. So, everytime calculation is better. Tested-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: Balbir Singh Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 5 ++- mm/memcontrol.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------- mm/vmscan.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h index 8752052da8df..056cf82c0e86 100644 --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h @@ -97,8 +97,7 @@ extern void mem_cgroup_note_reclaim_priority(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int priority); extern void mem_cgroup_record_reclaim_priority(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int priority); -int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, - struct zone *zone); +int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg); unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone, enum lru_list lru); @@ -252,7 +251,7 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_oom_called(struct task_struct *task) } static inline int -mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone) +mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { return 1; } diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index ab2ecbb95b8d..c7d78eca8363 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -166,9 +166,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup { unsigned int swappiness; - - unsigned int inactive_ratio; - /* * statistics. This must be placed at the end of memcg. */ @@ -432,15 +429,43 @@ void mem_cgroup_record_reclaim_priority(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int priority) spin_unlock(&mem->reclaim_param_lock); } -int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone) +static int calc_inactive_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long *present_pages) { unsigned long active; unsigned long inactive; + unsigned long gb; + unsigned long inactive_ratio; inactive = mem_cgroup_get_all_zonestat(memcg, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON); active = mem_cgroup_get_all_zonestat(memcg, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON); - if (inactive * memcg->inactive_ratio < active) + gb = (inactive + active) >> (30 - PAGE_SHIFT); + if (gb) + inactive_ratio = int_sqrt(10 * gb); + else + inactive_ratio = 1; + + if (present_pages) { + present_pages[0] = inactive; + present_pages[1] = active; + } + + return inactive_ratio; +} + +int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +{ + unsigned long active; + unsigned long inactive; + unsigned long present_pages[2]; + unsigned long inactive_ratio; + + inactive_ratio = calc_inactive_ratio(memcg, present_pages); + + inactive = present_pages[0]; + active = present_pages[1]; + + if (inactive * inactive_ratio < active) return 1; return 0; @@ -1432,29 +1457,6 @@ int mem_cgroup_shrink_usage(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask) return 0; } -/* - * The inactive anon list should be small enough that the VM never has to - * do too much work, but large enough that each inactive page has a chance - * to be referenced again before it is swapped out. - * - * this calculation is straightforward porting from - * page_alloc.c::setup_per_zone_inactive_ratio(). - * it describe more detail. - */ -static void mem_cgroup_set_inactive_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) -{ - unsigned int gb, ratio; - - gb = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_LIMIT) >> 30; - if (gb) - ratio = int_sqrt(10 * gb); - else - ratio = 1; - - memcg->inactive_ratio = ratio; - -} - static DEFINE_MUTEX(set_limit_mutex); static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, @@ -1496,9 +1498,6 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, if (!progress) retry_count--; } - if (!ret) - mem_cgroup_set_inactive_ratio(memcg); - return ret; } @@ -1858,7 +1857,7 @@ static int mem_control_stat_show(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft, } #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM - cb->fill(cb, "inactive_ratio", mem_cont->inactive_ratio); + cb->fill(cb, "inactive_ratio", calc_inactive_ratio(mem_cont, NULL)); { int nid, zid; @@ -2150,7 +2149,6 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont) res_counter_init(&mem->res, NULL); res_counter_init(&mem->memsw, NULL); } - mem_cgroup_set_inactive_ratio(mem); mem->last_scanned_child = NULL; spin_lock_init(&mem->reclaim_param_lock); diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index ece2f405187f..9a27c44aa327 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@ static int inactive_anon_is_low(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc) if (scanning_global_lru(sc)) low = inactive_anon_is_low_global(zone); else - low = mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(sc->mem_cgroup, zone); + low = mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(sc->mem_cgroup); return low; } -- 2.20.1