From c5e8f3f3bc4b5e4a73b075ea7128f48c3f215168 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Theodore Ts'o Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:54:06 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: remove EXT4_MB_{BITMAP,BUDDY} macros The EXT4_MB_BITMAP and EXT4_MB_BUDDY macros obfuscate more than they provide any abstraction. So remove them. Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- fs/ext4/mballoc.h | 2 -- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index 8e01214a4421..7e6fab9e889e 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ static void *mb_find_buddy(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, int order, int *max) { char *bb; - BUG_ON(EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b) == EXT4_MB_BUDDY(e4b)); + BUG_ON(e4b->bd_bitmap == e4b->bd_buddy); BUG_ON(max == NULL); if (order > e4b->bd_blkbits + 1) { @@ -438,10 +438,10 @@ static void *mb_find_buddy(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, int order, int *max) /* at order 0 we see each particular block */ if (order == 0) { *max = 1 << (e4b->bd_blkbits + 3); - return EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b); + return e4b->bd_bitmap; } - bb = EXT4_MB_BUDDY(e4b) + EXT4_SB(e4b->bd_sb)->s_mb_offsets[order]; + bb = e4b->bd_buddy + EXT4_SB(e4b->bd_sb)->s_mb_offsets[order]; *max = EXT4_SB(e4b->bd_sb)->s_mb_maxs[order]; return bb; @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ static int __mb_check_buddy(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, char *file, for (j = 0; j < (1 << order); j++) { k = (i * (1 << order)) + j; MB_CHECK_ASSERT( - !mb_test_bit(k, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b))); + !mb_test_bit(k, e4b->bd_bitmap)); } count++; } @@ -1203,10 +1203,10 @@ static int mb_find_order_for_block(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, int block) int order = 1; void *bb; - BUG_ON(EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b) == EXT4_MB_BUDDY(e4b)); + BUG_ON(e4b->bd_bitmap == e4b->bd_buddy); BUG_ON(block >= (1 << (e4b->bd_blkbits + 3))); - bb = EXT4_MB_BUDDY(e4b); + bb = e4b->bd_buddy; while (order <= e4b->bd_blkbits + 1) { block = block >> 1; if (!mb_test_bit(block, bb)) { @@ -1276,9 +1276,9 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b, /* let's maintain fragments counter */ if (first != 0) - block = !mb_test_bit(first - 1, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b)); + block = !mb_test_bit(first - 1, e4b->bd_bitmap); if (first + count < EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_maxs[0]) - max = !mb_test_bit(first + count, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b)); + max = !mb_test_bit(first + count, e4b->bd_bitmap); if (block && max) e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments--; else if (!block && !max) @@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b, block = first++; order = 0; - if (!mb_test_bit(block, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b))) { + if (!mb_test_bit(block, e4b->bd_bitmap)) { ext4_fsblk_t blocknr; blocknr = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, e4b->bd_group); @@ -1300,7 +1300,7 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b, "freeing already freed block " "(bit %u)", block); } - mb_clear_bit(block, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b)); + mb_clear_bit(block, e4b->bd_bitmap); e4b->bd_info->bb_counters[order]++; /* start of the buddy */ @@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ static int mb_find_extent(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, int order, int block, break; next = (block + 1) * (1 << order); - if (mb_test_bit(next, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b))) + if (mb_test_bit(next, e4b->bd_bitmap)) break; order = mb_find_order_for_block(e4b, next); @@ -1419,9 +1419,9 @@ static int mb_mark_used(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, struct ext4_free_extent *ex) /* let's maintain fragments counter */ if (start != 0) - mlen = !mb_test_bit(start - 1, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b)); + mlen = !mb_test_bit(start - 1, e4b->bd_bitmap); if (start + len < EXT4_SB(e4b->bd_sb)->s_mb_maxs[0]) - max = !mb_test_bit(start + len, EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b)); + max = !mb_test_bit(start + len, e4b->bd_bitmap); if (mlen && max) e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments++; else if (!mlen && !max) @@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ static int mb_mark_used(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, struct ext4_free_extent *ex) } mb_set_largest_free_order(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_info); - ext4_set_bits(EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b), ex->fe_start, len0); + ext4_set_bits(e4b->bd_bitmap, ex->fe_start, len0); mb_check_buddy(e4b); return ret; @@ -1763,7 +1763,7 @@ void ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, struct ext4_buddy *e4b) { struct super_block *sb = ac->ac_sb; - void *bitmap = EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b); + void *bitmap = e4b->bd_bitmap; struct ext4_free_extent ex; int i; int free; @@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@ void ext4_mb_scan_aligned(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, { struct super_block *sb = ac->ac_sb; struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); - void *bitmap = EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b); + void *bitmap = e4b->bd_bitmap; struct ext4_free_extent ex; ext4_fsblk_t first_group_block; ext4_fsblk_t a; diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h index 7128f46d8501..c070618c21ce 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h @@ -212,8 +212,6 @@ struct ext4_buddy { __u16 bd_blkbits; ext4_group_t bd_group; }; -#define EXT4_MB_BITMAP(e4b) ((e4b)->bd_bitmap) -#define EXT4_MB_BUDDY(e4b) ((e4b)->bd_buddy) static inline ext4_fsblk_t ext4_grp_offs_to_block(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_free_extent *fex) -- 2.20.1