From c3f5902325d3053986e7359f706581d8f032e72f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:37:07 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] Fix RCU race in access of nohz_cpu_mask Accessing nohz_cpu_mask before incrementing rcp->cur is racy. It can cause tickless idle CPUs to be included in rsp->cpumask, which will extend graceperiods unnecessarily. Fix this race. It has been tested using extensions to RCU torture module that forces various CPUs to become idle. Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri Cc: Dipankar Sarma Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/rcupdate.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c index f45b91723dc6..48d3bce465b8 100644 --- a/kernel/rcupdate.c +++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c @@ -257,15 +257,23 @@ static void rcu_start_batch(struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp, struct rcu_state *rsp, if (rcp->next_pending && rcp->completed == rcp->cur) { - /* Can't change, since spin lock held. */ - cpus_andnot(rsp->cpumask, cpu_online_map, nohz_cpu_mask); - rcp->next_pending = 0; - /* next_pending == 0 must be visible in __rcu_process_callbacks() - * before it can see new value of cur. + /* + * next_pending == 0 must be visible in + * __rcu_process_callbacks() before it can see new value of cur. */ smp_wmb(); rcp->cur++; + + /* + * Accessing nohz_cpu_mask before incrementing rcp->cur needs a + * Barrier Otherwise it can cause tickless idle CPUs to be + * included in rsp->cpumask, which will extend graceperiods + * unnecessarily. + */ + smp_mb(); + cpus_andnot(rsp->cpumask, cpu_online_map, nohz_cpu_mask); + } } -- 2.20.1