From c2329ade22844054f4dce79fb9358d8f9f0421a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:12:15 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] perf session: Don't count per evsel events PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE was not being counted here and is the only per-evsel thing anyway, the other events were not mapping to a evsel. With this we don't require that evsels used with a perf_session need to have space for hists, like the ones in annotate, report, top. Cc: Adrian Hunter Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: David Ahern Cc: Don Zickus Cc: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Jean Pihet Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-kzchpz0l1mhrsfpkirz086m2@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/util/session.c | 16 ---------------- 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c index 1d423548862f..66cae50b5c4c 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c @@ -813,22 +813,6 @@ int perf_session__deliver_event(struct perf_session *session, dump_event(session, event, file_offset, sample); evsel = perf_evlist__id2evsel(session->evlist, sample->id); - if (evsel != NULL && event->header.type != PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE) { - /* - * XXX We're leaving PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE unnacounted here - * because the tools right now may apply filters, discarding - * some of the samples. For consistency, in the future we - * should have something like nr_filtered_samples and remove - * the sample->period from total_sample_period, etc, KISS for - * now tho. - * - * Also testing against NULL allows us to handle files without - * attr.sample_id_all and/or without PERF_SAMPLE_ID. In the - * future probably it'll be a good idea to restrict event - * processing via perf_session to files with both set. - */ - hists__inc_nr_events(evsel__hists(evsel), event->header.type); - } machine = perf_session__find_machine_for_cpumode(session, event, sample); -- 2.20.1