From c0f5b82cd1a839090db19009ab126a8ad4a7602d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Vetter Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 08:09:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Catch abuse of I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_* A bit tricky since 0 is also a valid constant ... v2: Add DRM_DEBUG (Chris) Testcase: igt/gem_exec_params/rel-constants-* Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c index 04102cc80ef4..c7ef65c3ae91 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c @@ -1060,14 +1060,22 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_GENERAL: case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_ABSOLUTE: case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE: - if (ring == &dev_priv->ring[RCS] && - mode != dev_priv->relative_constants_mode) { - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4) + if (mode != 0 && ring != &dev_priv->ring[RCS]) { + DRM_DEBUG("non-0 rel constants mode on non-RCS\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (mode != dev_priv->relative_constants_mode) { + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4) { + DRM_DEBUG("no rel constants on pre-gen4\n"); return -EINVAL; + } if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen > 5 && - mode == I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE) + mode == I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE) { + DRM_DEBUG("rel surface constants mode invalid on gen5+\n"); return -EINVAL; + } /* The HW changed the meaning on this bit on gen6 */ if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) -- 2.20.1