From c013b65ad8a1e132f733404809afc72f7d00e768 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rasmus Villemoes Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 10:56:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: introduce watchdog_worker_should_ping helper This will be useful when the condition becomes slightly more complicated in the next patch. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes Reviewed-by: Esben Haabendal Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck --- drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c index 4bc7ab60b12c..0826e663bd5a 100644 --- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c +++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c @@ -195,18 +195,23 @@ static int watchdog_ping(struct watchdog_device *wdd) return __watchdog_ping(wdd); } +static bool watchdog_worker_should_ping(struct watchdog_core_data *wd_data) +{ + struct watchdog_device *wdd = wd_data->wdd; + + return wdd && (watchdog_active(wdd) || watchdog_hw_running(wdd)); +} + static void watchdog_ping_work(struct work_struct *work) { struct watchdog_core_data *wd_data; - struct watchdog_device *wdd; wd_data = container_of(to_delayed_work(work), struct watchdog_core_data, work); mutex_lock(&wd_data->lock); - wdd = wd_data->wdd; - if (wdd && (watchdog_active(wdd) || watchdog_hw_running(wdd))) - __watchdog_ping(wdd); + if (watchdog_worker_should_ping(wd_data)) + __watchdog_ping(wd_data->wdd); mutex_unlock(&wd_data->lock); } -- 2.20.1