From bfe8b5738a5d99156d83dc298729552ce82309d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Lespiau, Damien" Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:31:05 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] drm: Specify a bit more the DRM_CAP_CURSOR_{WIDTH, HEIGHT} caps Earlier this week, there was a bit of confusion about those new capabilities, to the point I think it's better to document the intention and API contract. The comment documents the current situation: - the radeon driver returns the only valid size for the hw - i915 returns the maximun cursor size - other drivers fall back to returning 64x64 The common contract is to return a valid cursor size. Cc: Sagar Kamble Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Alex Deucher Cc: Imre Deak Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie --- include/uapi/drm/drm.h | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h index b06c8ed68707..ec6b259a879c 100644 --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h @@ -619,6 +619,15 @@ struct drm_gem_open { #define DRM_PRIME_CAP_EXPORT 0x2 #define DRM_CAP_TIMESTAMP_MONOTONIC 0x6 #define DRM_CAP_ASYNC_PAGE_FLIP 0x7 +/* + * The CURSOR_WIDTH and CURSOR_HEIGHT capabilities return a valid widthxheight + * combination for the hardware cursor. The intention is that a hardware + * agnostic userspace can query a cursor plane size to use. + * + * Note that the cross-driver contract is to merely return a valid size; + * drivers are free to attach another meaning on top, eg. i915 returns the + * maximum plane size. + */ #define DRM_CAP_CURSOR_WIDTH 0x8 #define DRM_CAP_CURSOR_HEIGHT 0x9 -- 2.20.1