From be7be6e161a218e92c4e46b97ba59c1e40cfea9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Westphal Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:49:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: ipvs: fix incorrect conflict resolution The commit ab8bc7ed864b9c4f1fcb00a22bbe4e0f66ce8003 ("netfilter: remove nf_ct_is_untracked") changed the line if (ct && !nf_ct_is_untracked(ct) && nfct_nat(ct)) { to if (ct && nfct_nat(ct)) { meanwhile, the commit 41390895e50bc4f28abe384c6b35ac27464a20ec ("netfilter: ipvs: don't check for presence of nat extension") from ipvs-next had changed the same line to if (ct && !nf_ct_is_untracked(ct) && (ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK)) { When ipvs-next got merged into nf-next, the merge resolution took the first version, dropping the conversion of nfct_nat(). While this doesn't cause a problem at the moment, it will once we stop adding the nat extension by default. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso --- net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c index af3a9bbdf2ae..fb780be76d15 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c @@ -260,8 +260,9 @@ static int ip_vs_ftp_out(struct ip_vs_app *app, struct ip_vs_conn *cp, buf_len = strlen(buf); ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo); - if (ct && nfct_nat(ct)) { + if (ct && (ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK)) { bool mangled; + /* If mangling fails this function will return 0 * which will cause the packet to be dropped. * Mangling can only fail under memory pressure, -- 2.20.1