From be436f6238a17b8432b9de0212bcfc838afb1f85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi.px@renesas.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 19:22:09 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] UBI: misc comment fixes

Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi.px@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c   | 6 +++---
 drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c
index 016ec1387bc2..4b979e34b159 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c
@@ -64,9 +64,9 @@
  * device, e.g., make @ubi->min_io_size = 512 in the example above?
  *
  * A: because when writing a sub-page, MTD still writes a full 2K page but the
- * bytes which are no relevant to the sub-page are 0xFF. So, basically, writing
- * 4x512 sub-pages is 4 times slower than writing one 2KiB NAND page. Thus, we
- * prefer to use sub-pages only for EV and VID headers.
+ * bytes which are not relevant to the sub-page are 0xFF. So, basically,
+ * writing 4x512 sub-pages is 4 times slower than writing one 2KiB NAND page.
+ * Thus, we prefer to use sub-pages only for EC and VID headers.
  *
  * As it was noted above, the VID header may start at a non-aligned offset.
  * For example, in case of a 2KiB page NAND flash with a 512 bytes sub-page,
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c
index cd90ff3b76b1..14c10bed94ee 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static struct ubi_vtbl_record *process_lvol(struct ubi_device *ubi,
 	 * 0 contains more recent information.
 	 *
 	 * So the plan is to first check LEB 0. Then
-	 * a. if LEB 0 is OK, it must be containing the most resent data; then
+	 * a. if LEB 0 is OK, it must be containing the most recent data; then
 	 *    we compare it with LEB 1, and if they are different, we copy LEB
 	 *    0 to LEB 1;
 	 * b. if LEB 0 is corrupted, but LEB 1 has to be OK, and we copy LEB 1
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ int ubi_read_volume_table(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_scan_info *si)
 		goto out_free;
 
 	/*
-	 * Get sure that the scanning information is consistent to the
+	 * Make sure that the scanning information is consistent to the
 	 * information stored in the volume table.
 	 */
 	err = check_scanning_info(ubi, si);
-- 
2.20.1