From bdd804f478a0cc74bf7db8e9f9d5fd379d1b31ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Jackson Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 15:00:09 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] Cpuset: might sleep checking zones allowed fix Fix a couple of infrequently encountered 'sleeping function called from invalid context' in the cpuset hooks in __alloc_pages. Could sleep while interrupts disabled. The routine cpuset_zone_allowed() is called by code in mm/page_alloc.c __alloc_pages() to determine if a zone is allowed in the current tasks cpuset. This routine can sleep, for certain GFP_KERNEL allocations, if the zone is on a memory node not allowed in the current cpuset, but might be allowed in a parent cpuset. But we can't sleep in __alloc_pages() if in interrupt, nor if called for a GFP_ATOMIC request (__GFP_WAIT not set in gfp_flags). The rule was intended to be: Don't call cpuset_zone_allowed() if you can't sleep, unless you pass in the __GFP_HARDWALL flag set in gfp_flag, which disables the code that might scan up ancestor cpusets and sleep. This rule was being violated in a couple of places, due to a bogus change made (by myself, pj) to __alloc_pages() as part of the November 2005 effort to cleanup its logic, and also due to a later fix to constrain which swap daemons were awoken. The bogus change can be seen at: http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2005-11/4691.html [PATCH 01/05] mm fix __alloc_pages cpuset ALLOC_* flags This was first noticed on a tight memory system, in code that was disabling interrupts and doing allocation requests with __GFP_WAIT not set, which resulted in __might_sleep() writing complaints to the log "Debug: sleeping function called ...", when the code in cpuset_zone_allowed() tried to take the callback_sem cpuset semaphore. We haven't seen a system hang on this 'might_sleep' yet, but we are at decent risk of seeing it fairly soon, especially since the additional cpuset_zone_allowed() check was added, conditioning wakeup_kswapd(), in March 2006. Special thanks to Dave Chinner, for figuring this out, and a tip of the hat to Nick Piggin who warned me of this back in Nov 2005, before I was ready to listen. Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/page_alloc.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 813b4ec1298a..bb3416932ab0 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ restart: goto got_pg; do { - if (cpuset_zone_allowed(*z, gfp_mask)) + if (cpuset_zone_allowed(*z, gfp_mask|__GFP_HARDWALL)) wakeup_kswapd(*z, order); } while (*(++z)); @@ -970,7 +970,8 @@ restart: alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HARDER; if (gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGH) alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HIGH; - alloc_flags |= ALLOC_CPUSET; + if (wait) + alloc_flags |= ALLOC_CPUSET; /* * Go through the zonelist again. Let __GFP_HIGH and allocations -- 2.20.1