From bcfcc8ba29c933ee98c7f498ee7ccfa17be400dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Harrison Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:49:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Additional request structure tracing Added the request structure's 'uniq' identifier to the trace information. Also renamed the '_complete' trace event to '_notify' as it actually happens in the IRQ 'notify_ring()' function. The intention is to add a new '_complete' trace event which occurs when a request structure is actually marked as complete. However, at the moment the completion status is re-tested every time the query is made so there isn't a completion event as such. v2: New patch added to series. v3: Rebased to remove completion caching as that is apparently contentious. Change-Id: Ic9bcde67d175c6c03b96217cdcb6e4cc4aa45d67 For: VIZ-4377 Signed-off-by: John Harrison Reviewed-by: Thomas Daniel Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c index 7913a72ce30a..08a5a4ba52ac 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c @@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ static void notify_ring(struct drm_device *dev, if (!intel_ring_initialized(ring)) return; - trace_i915_gem_request_complete(ring); + trace_i915_gem_request_notify(ring); wake_up_all(&ring->irq_queue); } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h index 2ade958f28f8..6058a01b4443 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h @@ -406,6 +406,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request, TP_STRUCT__entry( __field(u32, dev) __field(u32, ring) + __field(u32, uniq) __field(u32, seqno) ), @@ -414,11 +415,13 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_get_ring(req); __entry->dev = ring->dev->primary->index; __entry->ring = ring->id; + __entry->uniq = req ? req->uniq : 0; __entry->seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(req); ), - TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, seqno=%u", - __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->seqno) + TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, uniq=%u, seqno=%u", + __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->uniq, + __entry->seqno) ); DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_add, @@ -426,7 +429,7 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_add, TP_ARGS(req) ); -TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_complete, +TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_notify, TP_PROTO(struct intel_engine_cs *ring), TP_ARGS(ring), @@ -451,6 +454,11 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_retire, TP_ARGS(req) ); +DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_complete, + TP_PROTO(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req), + TP_ARGS(req) +); + TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_wait_begin, TP_PROTO(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req), TP_ARGS(req), @@ -458,6 +466,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_wait_begin, TP_STRUCT__entry( __field(u32, dev) __field(u32, ring) + __field(u32, uniq) __field(u32, seqno) __field(bool, blocking) ), @@ -473,14 +482,15 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_wait_begin, i915_gem_request_get_ring(req); __entry->dev = ring->dev->primary->index; __entry->ring = ring->id; + __entry->uniq = req ? req->uniq : 0; __entry->seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(req); __entry->blocking = mutex_is_locked(&ring->dev->struct_mutex); ), - TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, seqno=%u, blocking=%s", - __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->seqno, - __entry->blocking ? "yes (NB)" : "no") + TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, uniq=%u, seqno=%u, blocking=%s", + __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->uniq, + __entry->seqno, __entry->blocking ? "yes (NB)" : "no") ); DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_wait_end, -- 2.20.1