From b7af41a1bc255c0098c37a4bcf5c7e5e168ce875 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andi Kleen Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 07:40:44 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86: Suppress duplicated abort LBR records Haswell always give an extra LBR record after every TSX abort. Suppress the extra record. This only works when the abort is visible in the LBR If the original abort has already left the 16 LBR entries the extra entry will will stay. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1379688044-14173-7-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++------ 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h index ce84edeeae27..fd00bb29425d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h @@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ struct x86_pmu { int lbr_nr; /* hardware stack size */ u64 lbr_sel_mask; /* LBR_SELECT valid bits */ const int *lbr_sel_map; /* lbr_select mappings */ + bool lbr_double_abort; /* duplicated lbr aborts */ /* * Extra registers for events diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c index 36b5ab884c15..0fa4f242f050 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c @@ -2519,6 +2519,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void) x86_pmu.hw_config = hsw_hw_config; x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = hsw_get_event_constraints; x86_pmu.cpu_events = hsw_events_attrs; + x86_pmu.lbr_double_abort = true; pr_cont("Haswell events, "); break; diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c index d5be06a5005e..90ee6c1d0542 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c @@ -284,6 +284,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc) int lbr_format = x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format; u64 tos = intel_pmu_lbr_tos(); int i; + int out = 0; for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.lbr_nr; i++) { unsigned long lbr_idx = (tos - i) & mask; @@ -306,15 +307,27 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc) } from = (u64)((((s64)from) << skip) >> skip); - cpuc->lbr_entries[i].from = from; - cpuc->lbr_entries[i].to = to; - cpuc->lbr_entries[i].mispred = mis; - cpuc->lbr_entries[i].predicted = pred; - cpuc->lbr_entries[i].in_tx = in_tx; - cpuc->lbr_entries[i].abort = abort; - cpuc->lbr_entries[i].reserved = 0; + /* + * Some CPUs report duplicated abort records, + * with the second entry not having an abort bit set. + * Skip them here. This loop runs backwards, + * so we need to undo the previous record. + * If the abort just happened outside the window + * the extra entry cannot be removed. + */ + if (abort && x86_pmu.lbr_double_abort && out > 0) + out--; + + cpuc->lbr_entries[out].from = from; + cpuc->lbr_entries[out].to = to; + cpuc->lbr_entries[out].mispred = mis; + cpuc->lbr_entries[out].predicted = pred; + cpuc->lbr_entries[out].in_tx = in_tx; + cpuc->lbr_entries[out].abort = abort; + cpuc->lbr_entries[out].reserved = 0; + out++; } - cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = i; + cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = out; } void intel_pmu_lbr_read(void) -- 2.20.1