From a87ff62a80a6a65fc664cd410061910b8c52b896 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maarten Maathuis Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:47:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drm/nv50: delete ramfc object after disabling fifo, not before ramfc is zero'ed upon destruction, so it's safer to do things in the right order. Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c index 32b244bcb482..204a79ff10f4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c @@ -317,17 +317,20 @@ void nv50_fifo_destroy_context(struct nouveau_channel *chan) { struct drm_device *dev = chan->dev; + struct nouveau_gpuobj_ref *ramfc = chan->ramfc; NV_DEBUG(dev, "ch%d\n", chan->id); - nouveau_gpuobj_ref_del(dev, &chan->ramfc); - nouveau_gpuobj_ref_del(dev, &chan->cache); - + /* This will ensure the channel is seen as disabled. */ + chan->ramfc = NULL; nv50_fifo_channel_disable(dev, chan->id, false); /* Dummy channel, also used on ch 127 */ if (chan->id == 0) nv50_fifo_channel_disable(dev, 127, false); + + nouveau_gpuobj_ref_del(dev, &ramfc); + nouveau_gpuobj_ref_del(dev, &chan->cache); } int -- 2.20.1