From a3fb577e481d64dc757f506e19685603bbf3db42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Huth Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:10:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Improve is_valid_psw() As a program status word is also invalid (and thus generates an specification exception) if the instruction address is not even, we should test this in is_valid_psw(), too. This patch also exports the function so that it becomes available for other parts of the S390 KVM code as well. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger --- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 1 + arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h index c28423a3acc0..38b589d69951 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ void kvm_s390_reinject_io_int(struct kvm *kvm, int kvm_s390_mask_adapter(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id, bool masked); /* implemented in priv.c */ +int is_valid_psw(psw_t *psw); int kvm_s390_handle_b2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); int kvm_s390_handle_e5(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); int kvm_s390_handle_01(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c index 07d0c1025cb9..d99f5f0305a0 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c @@ -365,7 +365,8 @@ static void handle_new_psw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) #define PSW_ADDR_24 0x0000000000ffffffUL #define PSW_ADDR_31 0x000000007fffffffUL -static int is_valid_psw(psw_t *psw) { +int is_valid_psw(psw_t *psw) +{ if (psw->mask & PSW_MASK_UNASSIGNED) return 0; if ((psw->mask & PSW_MASK_ADDR_MODE) == PSW_MASK_BA) { @@ -376,6 +377,8 @@ static int is_valid_psw(psw_t *psw) { return 0; if ((psw->mask & PSW_MASK_ADDR_MODE) == PSW_MASK_EA) return 0; + if (psw->addr & 1) + return 0; return 1; } -- 2.20.1