From a02d6fd643cbd4c559113b35b31d3b04e4ec60c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Nesterov Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:02:46 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] signal: zap_pid_ns_processes: s/SEND_SIG_NOINFO/SEND_SIG_FORCED/ Change zap_pid_ns_processes() to use SEND_SIG_FORCED, it looks more clear compared to SEND_SIG_NOINFO which relies on from_ancestor_ns logic send_signal(). It is also more efficient if we need to kill a lot of tasks because it doesn't alloc sigqueue. While at it, add the __fatal_signal_pending(task) check as a minor optimization. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Anton Vorontsov Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: David Rientjes Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/pid_namespace.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/pid_namespace.c b/kernel/pid_namespace.c index a8968396046d..17b232869a04 100644 --- a/kernel/pid_namespace.c +++ b/kernel/pid_namespace.c @@ -168,13 +168,9 @@ void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns) while (nr > 0) { rcu_read_lock(); - /* - * Any nested-container's init processes won't ignore the - * SEND_SIG_NOINFO signal, see send_signal()->si_fromuser(). - */ task = pid_task(find_vpid(nr), PIDTYPE_PID); - if (task) - send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_NOINFO, task); + if (task && !__fatal_signal_pending(task)) + send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, task); rcu_read_unlock(); -- 2.20.1