From 9cd40029423701c376391da59d2c6469672b4bed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Emelyanov Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:48:38 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] [NEIGH]: Fix race between neigh_parms_release and neightbl_fill_parms The neightbl_fill_parms() is called under the write-locked tbl->lock and accesses the parms->dev. The negh_parm_release() calls the dev_put(parms->dev) without this lock. This creates a tiny race window on which the parms contains potentially stale dev pointer. To fix this race it's enough to move the dev_put() upper under the tbl->lock, but note, that the parms are held by neighbors and thus can live after the neigh_parms_release() is called, so we still can have a parm with bad dev pointer. I didn't find where the neigh->parms->dev is accessed, but still think that putting the dev is to be done in a place, where the parms are really freed. Am I right with that? Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/core/neighbour.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c index 29b8ee4e35d6..cc8a2f190acf 100644 --- a/net/core/neighbour.c +++ b/net/core/neighbour.c @@ -1316,8 +1316,6 @@ void neigh_parms_release(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct neigh_parms *parms) *p = parms->next; parms->dead = 1; write_unlock_bh(&tbl->lock); - if (parms->dev) - dev_put(parms->dev); call_rcu(&parms->rcu_head, neigh_rcu_free_parms); return; } @@ -1328,6 +1326,8 @@ void neigh_parms_release(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct neigh_parms *parms) void neigh_parms_destroy(struct neigh_parms *parms) { + if (parms->dev) + dev_put(parms->dev); kfree(parms); } -- 2.20.1