From 9c0415eb8cbf0c8fd043b6c0f0354308ab099df5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vlastimil Babka Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:28:21 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] mm: more aggressive page stealing for UNMOVABLE allocations When allocation falls back to stealing free pages of another migratetype, it can decide to steal extra pages, or even the whole pageblock in order to reduce fragmentation, which could happen if further allocation fallbacks pick a different pageblock. In try_to_steal_freepages(), one of the situations where extra pages are stolen happens when we are trying to allocate a MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE page. However, MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE allocations are not treated the same way, although spreading such allocation over multiple fallback pageblocks is arguably even worse than it is for RECLAIMABLE allocations. To minimize fragmentation, we should minimize the number of such fallbacks, and thus steal as much as is possible from each fallback pageblock. Note that in theory this might put more pressure on movable pageblocks and cause movable allocations to steal back from unmovable pageblocks. However, movable allocations are not as aggressive with stealing, and do not cause permanent fragmentation, so the tradeoff is reasonable, and evaluation seems to support the change. This patch thus adds a check for MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE to the decision to steal extra free pages. When evaluating with stress-highalloc from mmtests, this has reduced the number of MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE fallbacks to roughly 1/6. The number of these fallbacks stealing from MIGRATE_MOVABLE block is reduced to 1/3. There was no observation of growing number of unmovable pageblocks over time, and also not of increased movable allocation fallbacks. Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Mel Gorman Cc: Zhang Yanfei Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Rik van Riel Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/page_alloc.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 7c44b49cec40..8d52ab18fe0d 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -1123,10 +1123,19 @@ static void change_pageblock_range(struct page *pageblock_page, } /* - * If breaking a large block of pages, move all free pages to the preferred - * allocation list. If falling back for a reclaimable kernel allocation, be - * more aggressive about taking ownership of free pages. If we claim more than - * half of the pageblock, change pageblock's migratetype as well. + * When we are falling back to another migratetype during allocation, try to + * steal extra free pages from the same pageblocks to satisfy further + * allocations, instead of polluting multiple pageblocks. + * + * If we are stealing a relatively large buddy page, it is likely there will + * be more free pages in the pageblock, so try to steal them all. For + * reclaimable and unmovable allocations, we steal regardless of page size, + * as fragmentation caused by those allocations polluting movable pageblocks + * is worse than movable allocations stealing from unmovable and reclaimable + * pageblocks. + * + * If we claim more than half of the pageblock, change pageblock's migratetype + * as well. */ static void try_to_steal_freepages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int start_type, int fallback_type) @@ -1141,6 +1150,7 @@ static void try_to_steal_freepages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, if (current_order >= pageblock_order / 2 || start_type == MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE || + start_type == MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE || page_group_by_mobility_disabled) { int pages; -- 2.20.1