From 9a790ba1ec02bbae0933e7ebd576c0bc329e9796 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tristan Ye Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:47:07 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ocfs2: skip existing hole when removing the last extent_rec in punching-hole codes. In the case of removing a partial extent record which covers a hole, current punching-hole logic will try to remove more than the length of whole extent record, which leads to the failure of following assert(fs/ocfs2/alloc.c): 5507 BUG_ON(cpos < le32_to_cpu(rec->e_cpos) || trunc_range > rec_range); This patch tries to skip existing hole at the last attempt of removing a partial extent record, what's more, it also adds some necessary comments for better understanding of punching-hole codes. Signed-off-by: Tristan Ye Signed-off-by: Joel Becker --- fs/ocfs2/file.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c index 41565ae52856..89659d6dc206 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c @@ -1607,6 +1607,9 @@ static void ocfs2_calc_trunc_pos(struct inode *inode, range = le32_to_cpu(rec->e_cpos) + ocfs2_rec_clusters(el, rec); if (le32_to_cpu(rec->e_cpos) >= trunc_start) { + /* + * remove an entire extent record. + */ *trunc_cpos = le32_to_cpu(rec->e_cpos); /* * Skip holes if any. @@ -1617,7 +1620,16 @@ static void ocfs2_calc_trunc_pos(struct inode *inode, *blkno = le64_to_cpu(rec->e_blkno); *trunc_end = le32_to_cpu(rec->e_cpos); } else if (range > trunc_start) { + /* + * remove a partial extent record, which means we're + * removing the last extent record. + */ *trunc_cpos = trunc_start; + /* + * skip hole if any. + */ + if (range < *trunc_end) + *trunc_end = range; *trunc_len = *trunc_end - trunc_start; coff = trunc_start - le32_to_cpu(rec->e_cpos); *blkno = le64_to_cpu(rec->e_blkno) + -- 2.20.1