From 93a73d442d370e20ed1009cd79cb29c4d7c0ee86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 19:08:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bpf, x86/arm64: remove useless checks on prog There is never such a situation, where bpf_int_jit_compile() is called with either prog as NULL or len as 0, so the tests are unnecessary and confusing as people would just copy them. s390 doesn't have them, so no change is needed there. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 3 --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 3 --- 2 files changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index b405bbb54431..ef35e866caf7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -772,9 +772,6 @@ void bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog) if (!bpf_jit_enable) return; - if (!prog || !prog->len) - return; - memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx)); ctx.prog = prog; diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 4286f3618bd0..f5bfd4fd28dd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1086,9 +1086,6 @@ void bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog) if (!bpf_jit_enable) return; - if (!prog || !prog->len) - return; - addrs = kmalloc(prog->len * sizeof(*addrs), GFP_KERNEL); if (!addrs) return; -- 2.20.1