From 90c45a36250b280f51af7fcce72ecfb3f9701f75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 22:17:17 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] selftests/x86/sigreturn/64: Fix spurious failures on AMD CPUs [ Upstream commit ec348020566009d3da9b99f07c05814d13969c78 ] When I wrote the sigreturn test, I didn't realize that AMD's busted IRET behavior was different from Intel's busted IRET behavior: On AMD CPUs, the CPU leaks the high 32 bits of the kernel stack pointer to certain userspace contexts. Gee, thanks. There's very little the kernel can do about it. Modify the test so it passes. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/86e7fd3564497f657de30a36da4505799eebef01.1530076529.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigreturn.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigreturn.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigreturn.c index 246145b84a12..2559e2c01793 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigreturn.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigreturn.c @@ -612,19 +612,38 @@ static int test_valid_sigreturn(int cs_bits, bool use_16bit_ss, int force_ss) greg_t req = requested_regs[i], res = resulting_regs[i]; if (i == REG_TRAPNO || i == REG_IP) continue; /* don't care */ - if (i == REG_SP) { - printf("\tSP: %llx -> %llx\n", (unsigned long long)req, - (unsigned long long)res); + if (i == REG_SP) { /* - * In many circumstances, the high 32 bits of rsp - * are zeroed. For example, we could be a real - * 32-bit program, or we could hit any of a number - * of poorly-documented IRET or segmented ESP - * oddities. If this happens, it's okay. + * If we were using a 16-bit stack segment, then + * the kernel is a bit stuck: IRET only restores + * the low 16 bits of ESP/RSP if SS is 16-bit. + * The kernel uses a hack to restore bits 31:16, + * but that hack doesn't help with bits 63:32. + * On Intel CPUs, bits 63:32 end up zeroed, and, on + * AMD CPUs, they leak the high bits of the kernel + * espfix64 stack pointer. There's very little that + * the kernel can do about it. + * + * Similarly, if we are returning to a 32-bit context, + * the CPU will often lose the high 32 bits of RSP. */ - if (res == (req & 0xFFFFFFFF)) - continue; /* OK; not expected to work */ + + if (res == req) + continue; + + if (cs_bits != 64 && ((res ^ req) & 0xFFFFFFFF) == 0) { + printf("[NOTE]\tSP: %llx -> %llx\n", + (unsigned long long)req, + (unsigned long long)res); + continue; + } + + printf("[FAIL]\tSP mismatch: requested 0x%llx; got 0x%llx\n", + (unsigned long long)requested_regs[i], + (unsigned long long)resulting_regs[i]); + nerrs++; + continue; } bool ignore_reg = false; @@ -663,13 +682,6 @@ static int test_valid_sigreturn(int cs_bits, bool use_16bit_ss, int force_ss) } if (requested_regs[i] != resulting_regs[i] && !ignore_reg) { - /* - * SP is particularly interesting here. The - * usual cause of failures is that we hit the - * nasty IRET case of returning to a 16-bit SS, - * in which case bits 16:31 of the *kernel* - * stack pointer persist in ESP. - */ printf("[FAIL]\tReg %d mismatch: requested 0x%llx; got 0x%llx\n", i, (unsigned long long)requested_regs[i], (unsigned long long)resulting_regs[i]); -- 2.20.1