From 8fff105e13041e49b82f92eef034f363a6b1c071 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:14:59 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: perf: reject groups spanning multiple HW PMUs The perf core implicitly rejects events spanning multiple HW PMUs, as in these cases the event->ctx will differ. However this validation is performed after pmu::event_init() is called in perf_init_event(), and thus pmu::event_init() may be called with a group leader from a different HW PMU. The ARM64 PMU driver does not take this fact into account, and when validating groups assumes that it can call to_arm_pmu(event->pmu) for any HW event. When the event in question is from another HW PMU this is wrong, and results in dereferencing garbage. This patch updates the ARM64 PMU driver to first test for and reject events from other PMUs, moving the to_arm_pmu and related logic after this test. Fixes a crash triggered by perf_fuzzer on Linux-4.0-rc2, with a CCI PMU present: Bad mode in Synchronous Abort handler detected, code 0x86000006 -- IABT (current EL) CPU: 0 PID: 1371 Comm: perf_fuzzer Not tainted 3.19.0+ #249 Hardware name: V2F-1XV7 Cortex-A53x2 SMM (DT) task: ffffffc07c73a280 ti: ffffffc07b0a0000 task.ti: ffffffc07b0a0000 PC is at 0x0 LR is at validate_event+0x90/0xa8 pc : [<0000000000000000>] lr : [] pstate: 00000145 sp : ffffffc07b0a3ba0 [< (null)>] (null) [] armpmu_event_init+0x174/0x3cc [] perf_try_init_event+0x34/0x70 [] perf_init_event+0xe0/0x10c [] perf_event_alloc+0x288/0x358 [] SyS_perf_event_open+0x464/0x98c Code: bad PC value Also cleans up the code to use the arm_pmu only when we know that we are dealing with an arm pmu event. Cc: Will Deacon Acked-by: Mark Rutland Acked-by: Peter Ziljstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c index 25a5308744b1..68a74151fa6c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c @@ -322,22 +322,31 @@ out: } static int -validate_event(struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events, - struct perf_event *event) +validate_event(struct pmu *pmu, struct pmu_hw_events *hw_events, + struct perf_event *event) { - struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu); + struct arm_pmu *armpmu; struct hw_perf_event fake_event = event->hw; struct pmu *leader_pmu = event->group_leader->pmu; if (is_software_event(event)) return 1; + /* + * Reject groups spanning multiple HW PMUs (e.g. CPU + CCI). The + * core perf code won't check that the pmu->ctx == leader->ctx + * until after pmu->event_init(event). + */ + if (event->pmu != pmu) + return 0; + if (event->pmu != leader_pmu || event->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF) return 1; if (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF && !event->attr.enable_on_exec) return 1; + armpmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu); return armpmu->get_event_idx(hw_events, &fake_event) >= 0; } @@ -355,15 +364,15 @@ validate_group(struct perf_event *event) memset(fake_used_mask, 0, sizeof(fake_used_mask)); fake_pmu.used_mask = fake_used_mask; - if (!validate_event(&fake_pmu, leader)) + if (!validate_event(event->pmu, &fake_pmu, leader)) return -EINVAL; list_for_each_entry(sibling, &leader->sibling_list, group_entry) { - if (!validate_event(&fake_pmu, sibling)) + if (!validate_event(event->pmu, &fake_pmu, sibling)) return -EINVAL; } - if (!validate_event(&fake_pmu, event)) + if (!validate_event(event->pmu, &fake_pmu, event)) return -EINVAL; return 0; -- 2.20.1