From 8a0921712ec6d00754b5d7afea78137772efee0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Laura Abbott Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 13:53:21 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] percpu: use VMALLOC_TOTAL instead of VMALLOC_END - VMALLOC_START vmalloc already gives a useful macro to calculate the total vmalloc size. Use it. Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo --- mm/percpu.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c index 0d10defe951e..afbf352ae580 100644 --- a/mm/percpu.c +++ b/mm/percpu.c @@ -1686,10 +1686,10 @@ int __init pcpu_embed_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size, size_t dyn_size, max_distance += ai->unit_size; /* warn if maximum distance is further than 75% of vmalloc space */ - if (max_distance > (VMALLOC_END - VMALLOC_START) * 3 / 4) { + if (max_distance > VMALLOC_TOTAL * 3 / 4) { pr_warning("PERCPU: max_distance=0x%zx too large for vmalloc " "space 0x%lx\n", max_distance, - (unsigned long)(VMALLOC_END - VMALLOC_START)); + VMALLOC_TOTAL); #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK /* and fail if we have fallback */ rc = -EINVAL; -- 2.20.1