From 89a80ed4c09afb2aff6abe32f6dd68605f857a7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Howells Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 22:36:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] rxrpc: Use skb->len not skb->data_len skb->len should be used rather than skb->data_len when referring to the amount of data in a packet. This will only cause a malfunction in the following cases: (1) We receive a jumbo packet (validation and splitting both are wrong). (2) We see if there's extra ACK info in an ACK packet (we think it's not there and just ignore it). Signed-off-by: David Howells --- net/rxrpc/input.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/rxrpc/input.c b/net/rxrpc/input.c index a707d5952164..5958ef8ba2a0 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/input.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/input.c @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static bool rxrpc_validate_jumbo(struct sk_buff *skb) { struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp = rxrpc_skb(skb); unsigned int offset = sp->offset; - unsigned int len = skb->data_len; + unsigned int len = skb->len; int nr_jumbo = 1; u8 flags = sp->hdr.flags; @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static void rxrpc_input_data(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb, u8 ack = 0, flags, annotation = 0; _enter("{%u,%u},{%u,%u}", - call->rx_hard_ack, call->rx_top, skb->data_len, seq); + call->rx_hard_ack, call->rx_top, skb->len, seq); _proto("Rx DATA %%%u { #%u f=%02x }", sp->hdr.serial, seq, sp->hdr.flags); @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static void rxrpc_input_data(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb, next_subpacket: queued = false; ix = seq & RXRPC_RXTX_BUFF_MASK; - len = skb->data_len; + len = skb->len; if (flags & RXRPC_JUMBO_PACKET) len = RXRPC_JUMBO_DATALEN; @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static void rxrpc_input_ack(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb, } offset = sp->offset + nr_acks + 3; - if (skb->data_len >= offset + sizeof(buf.info)) { + if (skb->len >= offset + sizeof(buf.info)) { if (skb_copy_bits(skb, offset, &buf.info, sizeof(buf.info)) < 0) return rxrpc_proto_abort("XAI", call, 0); rxrpc_input_ackinfo(call, skb, &buf.info); -- 2.20.1