From 881094532e2a27406a5f06f839087bd152a8a494 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lai Jiangshan Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 03:28:10 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: use rcu_read_lock_sched() instead for accessing pwq in RCU rcu_read_lock_sched() is better than preempt_disable() if the code is protected by RCU_SCHED. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo --- kernel/workqueue.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 79d1d347e690..b6c5a524d7c4 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -3962,7 +3962,7 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq) struct pool_workqueue *pwq; bool ret; - preempt_disable(); + rcu_read_lock_sched(); if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu); @@ -3970,7 +3970,7 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq) pwq = first_pwq(wq); ret = !list_empty(&pwq->delayed_works); - preempt_enable(); + rcu_read_unlock_sched(); return ret; } @@ -4354,16 +4354,16 @@ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void) * nr_active is monotonically decreasing. It's safe * to peek without lock. */ - preempt_disable(); + rcu_read_lock_sched(); for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) { WARN_ON_ONCE(pwq->nr_active < 0); if (pwq->nr_active) { busy = true; - preempt_enable(); + rcu_read_unlock_sched(); goto out_unlock; } } - preempt_enable(); + rcu_read_unlock_sched(); } out_unlock: mutex_unlock(&wq_mutex); -- 2.20.1