From 86cbbe24b4120aa4813c8519eb2b1506147fe0a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Engestrom Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 07:37:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: robust-futexes: fix spelling mistakes Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/robust-futexes.txt | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/robust-futexes.txt b/Documentation/robust-futexes.txt index af6fce23e484..61c22d608759 100644 --- a/Documentation/robust-futexes.txt +++ b/Documentation/robust-futexes.txt @@ -126,9 +126,9 @@ vma based method: - no VM changes are needed - 'struct address_space' is left alone. - - no registration of individual locks is needed: robust mutexes dont + - no registration of individual locks is needed: robust mutexes don't need any extra per-lock syscalls. Robust mutexes thus become a very - lightweight primitive - so they dont force the application designer + lightweight primitive - so they don't force the application designer to do a hard choice between performance and robustness - robust mutexes are just as fast. @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ and the remaining bits are for the TID. Testing, architecture support ----------------------------- -i've tested the new syscalls on x86 and x86_64, and have made sure the +I've tested the new syscalls on x86 and x86_64, and have made sure the parsing of the userspace list is robust [ ;-) ] even if the list is deliberately corrupted. -- 2.20.1