From 8627533c115c546649693d68fed6a74762c47d51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christof Schmitt Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:30:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [SCSI] zfcp: Fix evaluation of port handles in abort handler According to the FSF spec, word 0 (bytes 0-3) has the handle specified with the abort command and word 1 (bytes 4-7) has the handle for the command to be aborted. Fix the if statements that try to compare those. Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt Signed-off-by: Martin Peschke Signed-off-by: James Bottomley --- drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c index ff866ebd44ac..e697b1cb6d27 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c @@ -1164,8 +1164,8 @@ zfcp_fsf_abort_fcp_command_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *new_fsf_req) { int retval = -EINVAL; struct zfcp_unit *unit; - unsigned char status_qual = - new_fsf_req->qtcb->header.fsf_status_qual.word[0]; + union fsf_status_qual *fsf_stat_qual = + &new_fsf_req->qtcb->header.fsf_status_qual; if (new_fsf_req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR) { /* do not set ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ABORTSUCCEEDED */ @@ -1178,7 +1178,7 @@ zfcp_fsf_abort_fcp_command_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *new_fsf_req) switch (new_fsf_req->qtcb->header.fsf_status) { case FSF_PORT_HANDLE_NOT_VALID: - if (status_qual >> 4 != status_qual % 0xf) { + if (fsf_stat_qual->word[0] != fsf_stat_qual->word[1]) { debug_text_event(new_fsf_req->adapter->erp_dbf, 3, "fsf_s_phand_nv0"); /* @@ -1207,8 +1207,7 @@ zfcp_fsf_abort_fcp_command_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *new_fsf_req) break; case FSF_LUN_HANDLE_NOT_VALID: - if (status_qual >> 4 != status_qual % 0xf) { - /* 2 */ + if (fsf_stat_qual->word[0] != fsf_stat_qual->word[1]) { debug_text_event(new_fsf_req->adapter->erp_dbf, 3, "fsf_s_lhand_nv0"); /* -- 2.20.1