From 81ddbc69992a1f29aeb2a5b183e5228cc7c49caf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf8?q?Ville=20Syrj=C3=A4l=C3=A4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:27:31 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't initialize power seqeuencer delays more than
 once
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Since we read the current power seqeuncer delays from the registers
(as well as looking at the vbt and spec values) we may end up
corrupting delays we already initialized when we switch to another
pipe and the power seqeuncer there has different values currently
in the registers.

So make sure we only initialize the delays once even if
intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer() gets called multiple times.

There was some discussion in the review about when exactly we need to
unlock the pps. Quoting Bspec:

"If this bit is not a zero, it activates the register write protect
 and writes to those registers will be ignored unless the write
 protect key value is set in the panel sequencing control register."

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
[danvet: Add Bspec quote per review discussion between Imre and
Ville.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 269403154751..e1894cea44cc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -4733,6 +4733,10 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct drm_device *dev,
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->pps_mutex);
 
+	/* already initialized? */
+	if (final->t11_t12 != 0)
+		return;
+
 	if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
 		pp_ctrl_reg = PCH_PP_CONTROL;
 		pp_on_reg = PCH_PP_ON_DELAYS;
-- 
2.20.1