From 81b182a7542c4282191fa0b1e8d9fcb022c03e68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dirk Brandewie Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:04:33 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Update comments to talk about SDIO reset and not USB. Fixing comments from original cut and paste error Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie Signed-off-by: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez --- drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/sdio.c | 13 ++++++------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/sdio.c index 2981e211e04f..c67b0264a282 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/sdio.c +++ b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/sdio.c @@ -233,18 +233,17 @@ error_kzalloc: * Warm reset: * * The device will be fully reset internally, but won't be - * disconnected from the USB bus (so no reenumeration will + * disconnected from the bus (so no reenumeration will * happen). Firmware upload will be neccessary. * - * The device will send a reboot barker in the notification endpoint - * that will trigger the driver to reinitialize the state - * automatically from notif.c:i2400m_notification_grok() into - * i2400m_dev_bootstrap_delayed(). + * The device will send a reboot barker that will trigger the driver + * to reinitialize the state via __i2400m_dev_reset_handle. * - * Cold and bus (USB) reset: + * + * Cold and bus reset: * * The device will be fully reset internally, disconnected from the - * USB bus an a reenumeration will happen. Firmware upload will be + * bus an a reenumeration will happen. Firmware upload will be * neccessary. Thus, we don't do any locking or struct * reinitialization, as we are going to be fully disconnected and * reenumerated. -- 2.20.1