From 81213b5e8ae68e204aa7a3f83c4f9100405dbff9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "danborkmann@iogearbox.net" Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:47:43 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] rose_dev: fix memcpy-bug in rose_set_mac_address If both addresses equal, nothing needs to be done. If the device is down, then we simply copy the new address to dev->dev_addr. If the device is up, then we add another loopback device with the new address, and if that does not fail, we remove the loopback device with the old address. And only then, we update the dev->dev_addr. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/rose/rose_dev.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/rose/rose_dev.c b/net/rose/rose_dev.c index 178ff4f73c85..2679507ad333 100644 --- a/net/rose/rose_dev.c +++ b/net/rose/rose_dev.c @@ -96,11 +96,11 @@ static int rose_set_mac_address(struct net_device *dev, void *addr) struct sockaddr *sa = addr; int err; - if (!memcpy(dev->dev_addr, sa->sa_data, dev->addr_len)) + if (!memcmp(dev->dev_addr, sa->sa_data, dev->addr_len)) return 0; if (dev->flags & IFF_UP) { - err = rose_add_loopback_node((rose_address *)dev->dev_addr); + err = rose_add_loopback_node((rose_address *)sa->sa_data); if (err) return err; -- 2.20.1