From 801448e0672008acec050fbef3b8a7df7c5edcc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Lezcano Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:46:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] mfd : Cleanup duplicate db8500 definitions I missed in my previous patch the A9_MASK_REQ[_MASK] were already defined. Let's remove the duplicate definitions. The PRCMU_GIC_DELAY macro could be removed as it is not really useful here. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz --- drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c | 17 +++++++---------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c index b320cc602668..d2244dc5d3b1 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c @@ -821,23 +821,20 @@ u8 db8500_prcmu_get_power_state_result(void) return readb(tcdm_base + PRCM_ACK_MB0_AP_PWRSTTR_STATUS); } -#define PRCMU_A9_MASK_REQ 0x00000328 -#define PRCMU_A9_MASK_REQ_MASK 0x00000001 -#define PRCMU_GIC_DELAY 1 - /* This function decouple the gic from the prcmu */ int db8500_prcmu_gic_decouple(void) { - u32 val = readl(_PRCMU_BASE + PRCMU_A9_MASK_REQ); + u32 val = readl(PRCM_A9_MASK_REQ); /* Set bit 0 register value to 1 */ - writel(val | PRCMU_A9_MASK_REQ_MASK, _PRCMU_BASE + PRCMU_A9_MASK_REQ); + writel(val | PRCM_A9_MASK_REQ_PRCM_A9_MASK_REQ, + PRCM_A9_MASK_REQ); /* Make sure the register is updated */ - readl(_PRCMU_BASE + PRCMU_A9_MASK_REQ); + readl(PRCM_A9_MASK_REQ); /* Wait a few cycles for the gic mask completion */ - udelay(PRCMU_GIC_DELAY); + udelay(1); return 0; } @@ -845,10 +842,10 @@ int db8500_prcmu_gic_decouple(void) /* This function recouple the gic with the prcmu */ int db8500_prcmu_gic_recouple(void) { - u32 val = readl(_PRCMU_BASE + PRCMU_A9_MASK_REQ); + u32 val = readl(PRCM_A9_MASK_REQ); /* Set bit 0 register value to 0 */ - writel(val & ~PRCMU_A9_MASK_REQ_MASK, _PRCMU_BASE + PRCMU_A9_MASK_REQ); + writel(val & ~PRCM_A9_MASK_REQ_PRCM_A9_MASK_REQ, PRCM_A9_MASK_REQ); return 0; } -- 2.20.1