From 7e3fd813717693597daaa95dee875f4cb2d911ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lv Zheng Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 19:18:07 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / debugger: Fix regression introduced by IS_ERR_VALUE() removal The FIFO unlocking mechanism in acpi_dbg has been broken by the following commit: Commit: 287980e49ffc0f6d911601e7e352a812ed27768e Subject: remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses It converted !IS_ERR_VALUE(ret) into !ret which was not entirely correct. Fix the regression by taking ret > 0 into account too as appropriate. Fixes: 287980e49ffc (remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses) Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng [ rjw: Simplifications, changelog & subject massage ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c index 1f4128487dd4..dee86925a9a1 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static int acpi_aml_read_user(char __user *buf, int len) crc->tail = (crc->tail + n) & (ACPI_AML_BUF_SIZE - 1); ret = n; out: - acpi_aml_unlock_fifo(ACPI_AML_OUT_USER, !ret); + acpi_aml_unlock_fifo(ACPI_AML_OUT_USER, ret >= 0); return ret; } @@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ static int acpi_aml_write_user(const char __user *buf, int len) crc->head = (crc->head + n) & (ACPI_AML_BUF_SIZE - 1); ret = n; out: - acpi_aml_unlock_fifo(ACPI_AML_IN_USER, !ret); + acpi_aml_unlock_fifo(ACPI_AML_IN_USER, ret >= 0); return n; } -- 2.20.1