From 74a03b69d1b5ce00a568e142ca97e76b7f5239c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: john stultz Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 13:10:25 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] clockevents: prevent endless loop in tick_handle_periodic() tick_handle_periodic() can lock up hard when a one shot clock event device is used in combination with jiffies clocksource. Avoid an endless loop issue by requiring that a highres valid clocksource be installed before we call tick_periodic() in a loop when using ONESHOT mode. The result is we will only increment jiffies once per interrupt until a continuous hardware clocksource is available. Without this, we can run into a endless loop, where each cycle through the loop, jiffies is updated which increments time by tick_period or more (due to clock steering), which can cause the event programming to think the next event was before the newly incremented time and fail causing tick_periodic() to be called again and the whole process loops forever. [ Impact: prevent hard lock up ] Signed-off-by: John Stultz Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: stable@kernel.org --- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c index 21a5ca849514..83c4417b6a3c 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -93,7 +93,17 @@ void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev) for (;;) { if (!clockevents_program_event(dev, next, ktime_get())) return; - tick_periodic(cpu); + /* + * Have to be careful here. If we're in oneshot mode, + * before we call tick_periodic() in a loop, we need + * to be sure we're using a real hardware clocksource. + * Otherwise we could get trapped in an infinite + * loop, as the tick_periodic() increments jiffies, + * when then will increment time, posibly causing + * the loop to trigger again and again. + */ + if (timekeeping_valid_for_hres()) + tick_periodic(cpu); next = ktime_add(next, tick_period); } } -- 2.20.1