From 71791bee90dd29b292c7e55c1c00857578c912bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremy Kerr Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:58:37 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] [POWERPC] spufs: fix order of sputrace thread IDs Currently, we get the following output from sputrace: [5.097935954] 1606: spufs_ps_nopfn__enter (thread = 1605, spu = -1) [5.097958164] 1606: spufs_ps_nopfn__insert (thread = 1605, spu = 15) [5.097973529] 1607: spufs_ps_nopfn__enter (thread = 1605, spu = -1) [5.097989174] 1607: spufs_ps_nopfn__insert (thread = 1605, spu = 14) Which leads me to believe that 160[67] is the current thread ID, and 1605 is the context backing the psmap. However, the 'current' and 'owner' tids are reversed - the 'current' tid is on the right. This change puts the current thread ID in the left-hand column instead, and renames the right to 'ctxthread'. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr --- arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sputrace.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sputrace.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sputrace.c index 01974f7776e1..79aa773f3c99 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sputrace.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sputrace.c @@ -58,12 +58,12 @@ static int sputrace_sprint(char *tbuf, int n) ktime_to_timespec(ktime_sub(t->tstamp, sputrace_start)); return snprintf(tbuf, n, - "[%lu.%09lu] %d: %s (thread = %d, spu = %d)\n", + "[%lu.%09lu] %d: %s (ctxthread = %d, spu = %d)\n", (unsigned long) tv.tv_sec, (unsigned long) tv.tv_nsec, - t->owner_tid, - t->name, t->curr_tid, + t->name, + t->owner_tid, t->number); } @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ struct spu_probe spu_probes[] = { { "spufs_ps_nopfn__insert", "%p %p", spu_context_event }, { "spu_acquire_saved__enter", "%p", spu_context_nospu_event }, { "destroy_spu_context__enter", "%p", spu_context_nospu_event }, + { "spufs_stop_callback__enter", "%p %p", spu_context_event }, }; static int __init sputrace_init(void) -- 2.20.1