From 70ad237515d99595ed03848bd8e549e50e83c4f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Li Zhong Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:33:59 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix warning reported by verify_cpu_node_mapping() With commit 2fabf084b6ad ("powerpc: reorder per-cpu NUMA information's initialization"), during boottime, cpu_numa_callback() is called earlier(before their online) for each cpu, and verify_cpu_node_mapping() uses cpu_to_node() to check whether siblings are in the same node. It skips the checking for siblings that are not online yet. So the only check done here is for the bootcpu, which is online at that time. But the per-cpu numa_node cpu_to_node() uses hasn't been set up yet (which will be set up in smp_prepare_cpus()). So I saw something like following reported: [ 0.000000] CPU thread siblings 1/2/3 and 0 don't belong to the same node! As we don't actually do the checking during this early stage, so maybe we could directly call numa_setup_cpu() in do_init_bootmem(). Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: Nathan Fontenot Signed-off-by: Li Zhong Acked-by: Nishanth Aravamudan Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman --- arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c index d7737a542fd7..9918c0200857 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c @@ -1128,8 +1128,7 @@ void __init do_init_bootmem(void) * early in boot, cf. smp_prepare_cpus(). */ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { - cpu_numa_callback(&ppc64_numa_nb, CPU_UP_PREPARE, - (void *)(unsigned long)cpu); + numa_setup_cpu((unsigned long)cpu); } } -- 2.20.1