From 6ab8886326a1b9a3a8d164d8174e3c20703a03a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:25:15 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] perf: hw_breakpoints: Fix percpu namespace clash Today's linux-next build failed with: kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:86: error: 'task_bp_pinned' redeclared as different kind of symbol ... Caused by commit dd17c8f72993f9461e9c19250e3f155d6d99df22 ("percpu: remove per_cpu__ prefix") from the percpu tree interacting with commit 56053170ea2a2c0dc17420e9b94aa3ca51d80408 ("hw-breakpoints: Fix task-bound breakpoint slot allocation") from the tip tree. Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Rusty Russell Cc: Christoph Lameter Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds LKML-Reference: <20091208182515.bb6dda4a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c index 02b492504a5a..03a0773ac2b2 100644 --- a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nr_cpu_bp_pinned); /* Number of pinned task breakpoints in a cpu */ -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, task_bp_pinned[HBP_NUM]); +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nr_task_bp_pinned[HBP_NUM]); /* Number of non-pinned cpu/task breakpoints in a cpu */ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nr_bp_flexible); @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(nr_bp_mutex); static unsigned int max_task_bp_pinned(int cpu) { int i; - unsigned int *tsk_pinned = per_cpu(task_bp_pinned, cpu); + unsigned int *tsk_pinned = per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned, cpu); for (i = HBP_NUM -1; i >= 0; i--) { if (tsk_pinned[i] > 0) @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct task_struct *tsk, int cpu, bool enable) count = task_bp_pinned(tsk); - tsk_pinned = per_cpu(task_bp_pinned, cpu); + tsk_pinned = per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned, cpu); if (enable) { tsk_pinned[count]++; if (count > 0) @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable) * - If attached to a single cpu, check: * * (per_cpu(nr_bp_flexible, cpu) || (per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned, cpu) - * + max(per_cpu(task_bp_pinned, cpu)))) < HBP_NUM + * + max(per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned, cpu)))) < HBP_NUM * * -> If there are already non-pinned counters in this cpu, it means * there is already a free slot for them. @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable) * - If attached to every cpus, check: * * (per_cpu(nr_bp_flexible, *) || (max(per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned, *)) - * + max(per_cpu(task_bp_pinned, *)))) < HBP_NUM + * + max(per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned, *)))) < HBP_NUM * * -> This is roughly the same, except we check the number of per cpu * bp for every cpu and we keep the max one. Same for the per tasks @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable) * - If attached to a single cpu, check: * * ((per_cpu(nr_bp_flexible, cpu) > 1) + per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned, cpu) - * + max(per_cpu(task_bp_pinned, cpu))) < HBP_NUM + * + max(per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned, cpu))) < HBP_NUM * * -> Same checks as before. But now the nr_bp_flexible, if any, must keep * one register at least (or they will never be fed). @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable) * - If attached to every cpus, check: * * ((per_cpu(nr_bp_flexible, *) > 1) + max(per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned, *)) - * + max(per_cpu(task_bp_pinned, *))) < HBP_NUM + * + max(per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned, *))) < HBP_NUM */ int reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp) { -- 2.20.1